Can a language have indenumerably many expressions?
History and Philosophy of Logic 4 (1-2):73-82 (1983)
| Abstract | A common assumption among philosophers is that every language has at most denumerably many expressions. This assumption plays a prominent role in many philosophical arguments. Recently formal systems with indenumerably many elements have been developed. These systems are similar to the more familiar denumerable first-order languages. This similarity makes it appear that the assumption is false. We argue that the assumption is true | |||||||||
| Keywords | denumerably many expressions indenumerably many expressions | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,664 |
| External links |
|
| Through your library | Configure |
Jeff Johnson (2010). Grice's Unspeakable Truths. Essays in Philosophy 11 (2):168-180.
Ben Caplan (2002). Quotation and Demonstration. Philosophical Studies 111 (1):69-80.
Charles Sayward (1988). Is English Infinite? Philosophical Papers 17 (2):141-151.
Kees van Deemter, Albert Gatt, Ielka van der Sluis & Richard Power (2011). Generation of Referring Expressions: Assessing the Incremental Algorithm. Cognitive Science 36 (5):799-836.
Peter Goldie (2000). Explaining Expressions of Emotion. Mind 109 (433):25-38.
Temre N. Davies & Donald D. Hoffman (2002). Psychophysical Studies of Expressions of Pain. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (4):458-459.
Hilla Jacobson-Horowitz (2004). Syntax, Semantics, and Intentional Aspects. Philosophical Papers 33 (1):67-95.
Philip Hugly & Charles Sayward (1981). Expressions and Tokens. Analysis 41 (4):181-187.
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2010-08-10Total downloads7 ( #133,381 of 549,012 )Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,272 of 549,012 )How can I increase my downloads? |

