Can imaginantion provide prima facie justification for possibility?

Southwest Philosophy Review 15 (1):149-156 (1999)
Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
DOI 10.5840/swphilreview199915130
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 15,974
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Mark T. Nelson (2002). What Justification Could Not Be. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 10 (3):265 – 281.
Eunjin Lee (2008). Pryor's Dogmatism Against The Skeptic. Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 53:155-161.
Steffen Borge (2003). The Word of Others. Journal of Applied Logic 1 (1-2):107-118.
Tomas Bogardus (2013). Undefeated Dualism. Philosophical Studies 165 (2):445-466.
Rob Lovering (2009). Futures of Value and the Destruction of Human Embryos. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 39 (3):pp. 463-488.
John Meixner (1987). Frequencies and Possibility. Philosophy Research Archives 13:73-77.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

6 ( #322,845 of 1,725,870 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

6 ( #110,118 of 1,725,870 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.