Corporate Moral Personhood and Three Conceptions of the Corporation

Business Ethics Quarterly 2 (4):435-459 (1992)
Despite some exceptions, the business ethics literature on the moral responsibility of corporations does not emphasize a subject critical to that inquiry: the general nature of corporations. This article attempts to lessen the imbalance by describing three conceptions of the corporation that have been prominent in twentieth century legal theorizing, and by sketching their implications for the moral responsibility of corporations. These three conceptions, at least two of which have counterparts in the philosophical and organizational theory literature, are the concession, aggregate, and real entity theories. The article concludes that the real entity theory is the most plausible of the lot. At least under prevailing tests of moral responsibility, it then contends, corporations-as-real-entities are morally responsible for most of their members' actions
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.2307/3857581
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 16,658
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
David T. Ozar (1985). Do Corporations Have Moral Rights? Journal of Business Ethics 4 (4):277 - 281.
Jeffery Smith (2011). A Political Account of Corporate Moral Responsibility. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 14 (2):223 - 246.
Richard T. George (1986). GM and Corporate Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics 5 (3):177 - 179.
John Forge (2002). Corporate Responsibility Revisited. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 16 (1):13-32.
Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen (2003). Identification and Responsibility. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 6 (4):349-376.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

14 ( #182,031 of 1,725,989 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

3 ( #210,870 of 1,725,989 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.