David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Business Ethics Quarterly 20 (3):533-543 (2010)
As value chains become longer with increases in outsourcing and subcontracting, the challenges of fi xing responsibility become more diffi cult. Using concepts from the literature on social networks, this paper considers issues of diffusion of responsibility and plausible deniability in such relationships. Specifi cally, this paper isolates three sources of denial of – or defense against – attributions of responsibility: connection, control and knowledge. It goes on to consider the effects on network density and actor centrality as third parties (tertius illuminans) alter the structure of these networks. Finally, preliminary conclusions are considered including suggestions for addressing these new challenges as well as the potential for conceptual cross-fertilization between network analysis and organizationalethics
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Sarah Roberts (2003). Supply Chain Specific? Understanding the Patchy Success of Ethical Sourcing Initiatives. Journal of Business Ethics 44 (2/3):159 - 170.
Ruth Meyer & Bruce Edmonds, Signatures in Networks Generated From Agent-Based Social Simulation Models.
Philip Brey (1999). Worker Autonomy and the Drama of Digital Networks in Organizations. Journal of Business Ethics 22 (1):15 - 25.
Norah Mulvaney-Day & Catherine A. Womack (2009). Obesity, Identity and Community: Leveraging Social Networks for Behavior Change in Public Health. Public Health Ethics 2 (3):250-260.
Terry Beckman, Alison Colwell & Peggy H. Cunningham (2009). The Emergence of Corporate Social Responsibility in Chile: The Importance of Authenticity and Social Networks. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 86 (2):191 - 206.
Anthony J. Daboub & Jerry M. Calton (2002). Stakeholder Learning Dialogues: How to Preserve Ethical Responsibility in Networks. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 41 (1-2):85 - 98.
Dov M. Gabbay (2009). Fibring Argumentation Frames. Studia Logica 93 (2/3):231 - 295.
David Murillo & Josep M. Lozano (2009). Pushing Forward Sme Csr Through a Network: An Account From the Catalan Model. Business Ethics 18 (1):7-20.
Merel Visse, Guy A. M. Widdershoven & Tineke A. Abma (2012). Moral Learning in an Integrated Social and Healthcare Service Network. Health Care Analysis 20 (3):281-296.
Daejoong Kim & Yoonjae Nam (2012). Corporate Relations with Environmental Organizations Represented by Hyperlinks on the Fortune Global 500 Companies' Websites. Journal of Business Ethics 105 (4):475-487.
Dominic Kaeslin (2007). Structure and Agency in Firm-Stakeholder Networks. Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 18:443-447.
Sjoerd D. Zwart, Ibo van de Poel, Harald van Mil & Michiel Brumsen (2006). A Network Approach for Distinguishing Ethical Issues in Research and Development. Science and Engineering Ethics 12 (4):663-684.
Frédéric Vandermoere & Raf Vanderstraeten (2012). Disciplinary Networks and Bounding: Scientific Communication Between Science and Technology Studies and the History of Science. [REVIEW] Minerva 50 (4):451-470.
D. M. Gabbay (2012). Equational Approach to Argumentation Networks. Argument and Computation 3 (2-3):87 - 142.
Added to index2011-01-09
Total downloads5 ( #176,011 of 1,006,518 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,735 of 1,006,518 )
How can I increase my downloads?