David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
OUP Oxford (2012)
God in the Age of Science? is a critical examination of strategies for the philosophical defence of religious belief. The main options may be presented as the end nodes of a decision tree for religious believers. The faithful can interpret a creedal statement (e.g. 'God exists') either as a truth claim, or otherwise. If it is a truth claim, they can either be warranted to endorse it without evidence, or not. Finally, if evidence is needed, should its evidential support be assessed by the same logical criteria that we use in evaluating evidence in science, or not? Each of these options has been defended by prominent analytic philosophers of religion. In part I Herman Philipse assesses these options and argues that the most promising for believers who want to be justified in accepting their creed in our scientific age is the Bayesian cumulative case strategy developed by Richard Swinburne. Parts II and III are devoted to an in-depth analysis of this case for theism. Using a 'strategy of subsidiary arguments', Philipse concludes (1) that theism cannot be stated meaningfully; (2) that if theism were meaningful, it would have no predictive power concerning existing evidence, so that Bayesian arguments cannot get started; and (3) that if the Bayesian cumulative case strategy did work, one should conclude that atheism is more probable than theism. Philipse provides a careful, rigorous, and original critique of atheism in the world today.
|Keywords||Religion Philosophy Theism Faith and reason God Proof Religion and science|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$43.11 used (47% off) $45.53 new (44% off) $68.45 direct from Amazon (15% off) Amazon page|
|Call number||In Process|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
John Danaher (2014). Necessary Moral Truths and Theistic Metaethics. Sophia 53 (3):309-330.
Similar books and articles
Eric vd Luft (2004). God, Evil, and Ethics: A Primer in the Philosophy of Religion. Gegensatz Press.
Michael L. Peterson (ed.) (2009). Reason & Religious Belief: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Religion. Oxford University Press.
Linda Zagzebski & Timothy Miller (eds.) (2009). Readings in Philosophy of Religion: Ancient to Contemporary. Wiley-Blackwell.
Michael Peterson, William Hasker, Bruce Reichenbach & David Basinger (2008). Reason and Religious Belief: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Religion. OUP USA.
Daniel Howard-Snyder & Michael Bergmann (2003). Grounds for Belief in God Aside, Does Evil Make Atheism More Reasonable Than Theism? In Michael Peterson & Raymond Van Arrogan (eds.), Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Religion. Blackwell. 140--55.
Germain Gabriel Grisez (1975). Beyond the New Theism: A Philosophy of Religion. University of Notre Dame Press.
Timothy Chappell (2011). Theism in Historical Perspective. European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 3 (1):123 - 138.
Adolf Grunbaum (1987). Psychoanalysis and Theism. The Monist 70 (2):152 - 192.
Paul Helm (ed.) (1999). Faith and Reason. Oxford University Press.
Victor Reppert (1989). Miracles and the Case for Theism. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 25 (1):35 - 51.
Rob Lovering (2009). On What God Would Do. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 66 (2):87 - 104.
Added to index2012-04-15
Total downloads8 ( #178,926 of 1,101,802 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #306,516 of 1,101,802 )
How can I increase my downloads?