Introduction: From legal theories to neural networks and fuzzy reasoning [Book Review]

Artificial Intelligence and Law 7 (2-3):115-128 (1999)
Abstract
Computational approaches to the law have frequently been characterized as being formalistic implementations of the syllogistic model of legal cognition: using insufficient or contradictory data, making analogies, learning through examples and experiences, applying vague and imprecise standards. We argue that, on the contrary, studies on neural networks and fuzzy reasoning show how AI & law research can go beyond syllogism, and, in doing that, can provide substantial contributions to the law.
Keywords analogy  fuzzy logic  learning  legal formalism  neural networks  vagueness
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 11,371
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Citations of this work BETA
Zsófia Kacsuk (2011). The Mathematics of Patent Claim Analysis. Artificial Intelligence and Law 19 (4):263-289.
Similar books and articles
Analytics

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-01-28

Total downloads

16 ( #104,063 of 1,102,846 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

3 ( #120,475 of 1,102,846 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.