Rate abuse: A reply to Olson

Analysis 69 (3):503-505 (2009)
Olson (2009) argues that time does not pass because (i) if it did it would have to pass at some rate, and (ii) there is no rate at which it could pass. This paper exposes a confusion about the nature of rates upon which this argument rests.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/analys/anp075
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 23,217
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Tim Maudlin (2002). Remarks on the Passing of Time. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 102 (3):237–252.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Bradford Skow (2012). ''One Second Per Second''. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 85 (2):377-389.
Jonathan Tallant (2013). Time. Analysis 73 (2):369-379.
Michael J. Raven (2011). Can Time Pass at the Rate of 1 Second Per Second? Australasian Journal of Philosophy 89 (3):459 - 465.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

82 ( #57,629 of 1,941,076 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

14 ( #62,212 of 1,941,076 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.