Business Ethics Quarterly 13 (1):25-41 (2003)
|Abstract||This paper is a preliminary attempt to better understand the concept of legitimacy in stakeholder theory. The normative componentof stakeholder theory plays a central role in the concept of legitimacy. Though the elaboration of legitimacy contained hereinapplies generally to all “normative cores” this paper relies on Phillips’s principle of stakeholder fairness and therefore begins with a brief description of this work. This is followed by a discussion of the importance of legitimacy to stakeholder theory as well as the general ambiguity of the term. A distinction is then drawn between normative and derivative legitimacy. Reference to this distinction helps distinguish between a relationship with the organization based on direct moral obligation and one based on the power to help or harm the organization. It is concluded that stakeholders who retain the ability to affect the organization are legitimate (derivatively), but that this legitimacy is derived from the moral obligation owed other (normative) stakeholders and that the two sorts of legitimacy are importantly different from one another. An example of the normative/derivative distinction at work in managerial decision making is elaborated upon and managerial and research implications are then suggested|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Adele Santana (2012). Three Elements of Stakeholder Legitimacy. Journal of Business Ethics 105 (2):257-265.
Ronald K. Mitchell, Bradley R. Agle, James J. Chrisman & Laura J. Spence (2011). Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Salience in Family Firms. Business Ethics Quarterly 21 (2):235-255.
Robert A. Phillips (2009). Private Security Companies and Institutional Legitimacy. Business Ethics Quarterly 19 (3):403-432.
Julia Roloff (2008). Learning From Multi-Stakeholder Networks: Issue-Focussed Stakeholder Management. Journal of Business Ethics 82 (1):233 - 250.
Robert A. Phillips & Joel Reichart (2000). The Environment as a Stakeholder? A Fairness-Based Approach. Journal of Business Ethics 23 (2):185 - 197.
Benjamin A. Neville, Simon J. Bell & Gregory J. Whitwell (2011). Stakeholder Salience Revisited: Refining, Redefining, and Refueling an Underdeveloped Conceptual Tool. Journal of Business Ethics 102 (3):357-378.
Robin W. Roberts (forthcoming). Toward a More Coherent Understanding of the Organization–Society Relationship: A Theoretical Consideration for Social and Environmental Accounting Research. Journal of Business Ethics.
Darryl Reed (1999). Stakeholder Management Theory. Business Ethics Quarterly 9 (3):453-483.
M. Coakley (2011). On the Value of Political Legitimacy. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 10 (4):345-369.
Cyrlene Claasen & Julia Roloff (2012). The Link Between Responsibility and Legitimacy: The Case of De Beers in Namibia. Journal of Business Ethics 107 (3):379-398.
Cathy Driscoll & Mark Starik (2004). The Primordial Stakeholder: Advancing the Conceptual Consideration of Stakeholder Status for the Natural Environment. Journal of Business Ethics 49 (1):55-73.
Milena M. Parent & David L. Deephouse (2007). A Case Study of Stakeholder Identification and Prioritization by Managers. Journal of Business Ethics 75 (1):1 - 23.
Päivi Myllykangas, Johanna Kujala & Hanna Lehtimäki (2010). Analyzing the Essence of Stakeholder Relationships: What Do We Need in Addition to Power, Legitimacy, and Urgency? Journal of Business Ethics 96 (S1):65-72.
Allen Kaufman & Ernie Englander (2011). Behavioral Economics, Federalism, and the Triumph of Stakeholder Theory. Journal of Business Ethics 102 (3):421-438.
Added to index2011-12-01
Total downloads3 ( #202,056 of 549,196 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,397 of 549,196 )
How can I increase my downloads?