Sophia 45 (2) (2006)
|Abstract||Religious pluralis does have, as James Kraft says, a negative impact on the epistemic confidence with which one holds a religious position, when epistemology is thought on both the externalist and internalist lines. I also conclude both that there is a resulting epistemic humility and that a tolerance of religious diversity results from it, but I reach these conclusions for entirely different reasons. Epistemic humility and religious tolerance are fostered by the realization that many religions are striving for the infinite, though all have limited views of it.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Philip L. Quinn & Kevin Meeker (eds.) (2000). The Philosophical Challenge of Religious Diversity. Oxford University Press.
Girard Brenneman (2006). A Pragmatic Defense of Religious Exclusivism. The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 8:13-18.
James J. Delaney & Jeffrey Dueck (2003). A Rethinking of Contemporary Religious Tolerance. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 77:73-82.
James Kraft (2007). Religious Disagreement, Externalism, and the Epistemology of Disagreement: Listening to Our Grandmothers. Religious Studies 43 (4):417-432.
David Basinger (1996). Pluralism and Justified Religious Belief. Faith and Philosophy 13 (2):260-265.
John Hick (1997). The Possibility of Religious Pluralism: A Reply to Gavin D'Costa. Religious Studies 33 (2):161-166.
Andrew Koehl (2005). On Blanket Statements About the Epistemic Effects of Religious Diversity. Religious Studies 41 (4):395-414.
Jeroen de Ridder (2011). Religious Exclusivism Unlimited. Religious Studies 47 (4):449-463.
James Kraft (2006). Philip Quinn's Contribution to the Epistemic Challenge of Religious Diversity. Religious Studies 42 (4):453-465.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads25 ( #49,656 of 549,198 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,397 of 549,198 )
How can I increase my downloads?