David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophical Investigations 34 (3):287-311 (2011)
In several posthumously published writings about the differences between humans and animals, Rush Rhees criticises the view that human lives are more important than (or superior to) animal lives. Rhees' views may seem to be in sympathy with more recent critiques of “speciesism.” However, the most commonly discussed anti-speciesist moral frameworks – which take the capacity of sentience as the criterion of moral considerability – are inadequate. Rhees' remark that both humans and animals can be loved points towards a different way of accounting for the moral considerability of humans and animals that avoid the problems of the capacity-based approaches
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Elizabeth Anderson (2004). Animal Rights and the Values of Nonhuman Life. In Cass R. Sunstein & Martha Craven Nussbaum (eds.), Animal Rights: Current Debates and New Directions. Oxford University Press 277.
Thomas H. Birch (1993). Moral Considerability and Universal Consideration. Environmental Ethics 15 (4):313-332.
Paola Cavalieri & Peter Singer (2009). The Death of the Animal: A Dialogue. Columbia University Press.
Stanley Cavell, Cora Diamond, John McDowell, Ian Hacking & Cary Wolfe (2008). Philosophy and Animal Life. Columbia University Press.
Jacques Derrida (2008). The Animal That Therefore I Am. Fordham University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Rush Rhees (1999). Moral Questions. St. Martin's Press.
Paul Shapiro (2006). Moral Agency in Other Animals. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 27 (4):357-373.
Rush Rhees (1997). Rush Rhees on Religion and Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.
R. G. Frey (1997). Moral Community and Animal Research in Medicine. Ethics and Behavior 7 (2):123 – 136.
J. L. Nelson (1988). Animals, Handicapped Children and the Tragedy of Marginal Cases. Journal of Medical Ethics 14 (4):191-193.
Benjamin Hale (2006). The Moral Considerability of Invasive Transgenic Animals. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 19 (4):337-366.
Peter Singer (2012). Animal Liberation at 30. In Stephen Holland (ed.), Arguing About Bioethics. Routledge 185.
Michael Naas (2010). Derridas Flair (For the Animals to Follow...). Research in Phenomenology 40 (2):219-242.
David E. W. Fenner (1998). Animal Rights and the Problem of Proximity. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 12 (1):51-61.
Frank Schalow (2000). Who Speaks for the Animals?: Heidegger and the Question of Animal Welfare. Environmental Ethics 22 (3):259-271.
Thaddeus Metz (2010). Animal Rights and the Interpretation of the South African Constitution. Southern African Public Law 25 (2):301-311.
Ansgar Beckermann (2010). Darwin – What If Man is Only an Animal, After All? Dialectica 64 (4):467-482.
Stephen Person (2012). Saving Animals From Fires. Bearport Pub..
Rush Rhees (1998). Wittgenstein and the Possibility of Discourse. Cambridge University Press.
Added to index2011-06-16
Total downloads23 ( #116,841 of 1,699,807 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #161,079 of 1,699,807 )
How can I increase my downloads?