Are Prototypes and Exemplars Used in Distinct Cognitive Processes?

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33 (2-3):226-227 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Machery’s argument that concepts split into different kinds is bold and inspiring but not fully persuasive. We will focus on the lack of evidence for the fourth tenet of Machery’s..

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Reply to Barbara Malt and Jesse Prinz.Edouard Machery - 2010 - Mind and Language 25 (5):634-646.
Doing without concepts.Edouard Machery - 2009 - New York: Oxford University Press.
What is wrong with prototypes.Peter Földiák - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (4):471-472.
The emergence of consciousness: BUC versus SOC.Ron Sun - 2002 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (3):355-356.
Cognitive Control: Componential or Emergent?Richard P. Cooper - 2010 - Topics in Cognitive Science 2 (4):598-613.
Why We Should Do Without Concepts.Barbara C. Malt - 2010 - Mind and Language 25 (5):622-633.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-03-12

Downloads
229 (#84,821)

6 months
3 (#1,023,809)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Gualtiero Piccinini
University of Missouri, St. Louis
James Virtel
University of Illinois, Chicago

Citations of this work

Concepts as Pluralistic Hybrids.Collin Rice - 2014 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 92 (3):597-619.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Doing without concepts.Edouard Machery - 2009 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Splitting concepts.Gualtiero Piccinini & Sam Scott - 2006 - Philosophy of Science 73 (4):390-409.

Add more references