Graduate studies at Western
Asian Philosophy 5 (1):23 – 38 (1995)
|Abstract||Abstract Cognitivism, presently the major paradigm of psychology, presents a scientific account of mental life. Buddhism also presents an account of mental life, but one which is integral with its wider ethical and transcendental concerns. The postmodern appraisal of science provides a framework within which these two accounts may be compared without inheriting many of the assumed oppositions between science and religion. It is concluded that cognitivism and Buddhism will have complementary roles in the development of a more pluralist psychological science. In this development it will be necessary to address what values are implicit in science|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Winston L. King (2001). In the Hope of Nibb⁻Ana: The Ethics of Therav⁻Ada Buddhism. Pariyatti Press.
Gyalwang Drukpa (2012). Everyday Enlightenment: The Essential Guide to Finding Happiness in the Modern World. Riverhead Hardcover.
Glenn Parsons (forthcoming). Science, Nature, and Moore's Syncretic Aesthetic. Ethics, Policy and Environment 12 (3):351-356.
Keith E. Stanovich (2005). On the Coexistence of Cognitivism and Intertemporal Bargaining. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (5):661-662.
Jin Y. Park (2003). Living the Inconceivable: Hua-Yen Buddhism and Postmodern Différend. Asian Philosophy 13 (2 & 3):165 – 174.
Jonathan Knowles (2000). Knowledge of Grammar as a Propositional Attitude. Philosophical Psychology 13 (3):325 – 353.
William Mikulas (2007). Buddhism & Western Psychology: Fundamentals of Integration. Journal of Consciousness Studies 14 (4):4-49.
Peter Harrison (2010). A Scientific Buddhism? Zygon 45 (4):861-869.
Added to index2009-02-01
Total downloads45 ( #28,970 of 739,406 )
Recent downloads (6 months)40 ( #2,313 of 739,406 )
How can I increase my downloads?