PhilSci Archive (2001)
|Abstract||Introspection used to be excluded from science because it isn?t public--for any question about mental states, only the person whose states are in question can answer by introspecting. However, we often use introspective reports to gauge each other?s minds, and contemporary psychologists generate data from them. I argue that some uses of introspection are as public as any scientific method|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
William G. Lycan (2002). Dretske's Ways of Introspecting. In Brie Gertler (ed.), Privileged Access: Philosophical Accounts of Self-Knowledge. Ashgate.
Gualtiero Piccinini (2009). First-Person Data, Publicity and Self-Measurement. Philosophers' Imprint 9 (9):1-16.
Denis G. Arnold (1997). Introspection and its Objects. Journal of Philosophical Research 22 (April):87-94.
Brie Gertler (2009). Introspection. In Patrick Wilken, Timothy J. Bayne & Axel Cleeremans (eds.), The Oxford Companion to Consciousness. Oxford University Press.
Gualtiero Piccinini (2003). Epistemic Divergence and the Publicity of Scientific Methods. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 34 (3):597-612.
Declan Smithies & Daniel Stoljar (eds.) (2012). Introspection and Consciousness. Oxford University Press.
Gualtiero Piccinini (2003). Data From Introspective Reports: Upgrading From Common Sense to Science. Journal of Consciousness Studies 10 (9-10):141-156.
Uljana Feest (2012). Introspection as a Method and Introspection as a Feature of Consciousness. Inquiry 55 (1):1 - 16.
William E. Seager (2000). Introspection and the Elementary Acts of Mind. Dialogue 39 (1):53-76.
Shaun Gallagher (2002). Experimenting with Introspection. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 6 (9):374-375.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads27 ( #45,693 of 548,970 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,438 of 548,970 )
How can I increase my downloads?