David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1990:459 - 469 (1990)
I respond to Allan Franklin's critique of my account of the establishment of parity-violating neutral-current effects in atomic and high-energy physics as an instance of a more general 'rationalist' attack on 'constructivist' understandings of science. I argue that constructivism does not entail the denial of 'reason' in science, but I note that there are typically too many 'reasons' to be found for 'reason' to count as an explanation of why science changes as it does. I show, first, that there were many 'reasonable' but different ways of reasoning about the field of evidence at issue in this episode and, second, that Franklin's articulation of how theory-choice should proceed on the basis of evidence implies a vicious conservatism which is fortunately not to be found in the history of science.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Alan Nelson (1994). How Could Scientific Facts Be Socially Constructed? Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 25 (4):535-547.
Slobodan Perovic (2011). Missing Experimental Challenges to the Standard Model of Particle Physics. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 42 (1):32-42.
Similar books and articles
Allan Franklin (1990). Do Mutants Have to Be Slain, or Do They Die of Natural Causes?: The Case of Atomic Parity Violation Experiments. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1990:487 - 494.
Allan Franklin (1990). Experiment, Right or Wrong. Cambridge University Press.
Michael Lynch (1990). Allan Franklin's Transcendental Physics. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1990:471 - 485.
Oliver Pooley (2003). Handedness, Parity Violation, and the Reality of Space. In Katherine Brading & Elena Castellani (eds.), Symmetries in Physics: Philosophical Reflections. Cambridge University Press 250--280.
Ruth Chang (2005). Parity, Interval Value, and Choice. Ethics 115 (2):331-350.
Nick Huggett (2000). Reflections on Parity Nonconservation. Philosophy of Science 67 (2):219-241.
Holger Lyre (2008). Does the Higgs Mechanism Exist? International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 22 (2):119-133.
Martijn Boot (2009). Parity, Incomparability and Rationally Justified Choice. Philosophical Studies 146 (1):75 - 92.
Ruth Chang (2002). The Possibility of Parity. Ethics 112 (4):659-688.
Richard Healey (2009). Gauging What's Real: The Conceptual Foundations of Contemporary Gauge Theories. OUP Oxford.
Steven Weinstein (1999). Gravity and Gauge Theory. Philosophy of Science 66 (3):155.
Kostas Gavroglu (1985). Popper's Tetradic Schema, Progressive Research Programs, and the Case of Parity Violation in Elementary Particle Physics 1953–1958. Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 16 (2):261-286.
Allan Franklin (1979). The Discovery and Nondiscovery of Parity Nonconservation. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 10 (3):201-257.
Peter Lipton (1990). Prediction and Prejudice. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 4 (1):51 – 65.
Holger Lyre (2004). Holism and Structuralism in (1) Gauge Theory. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 35 (4):643-670.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2011-05-29
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?