David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Hurlburt and Schwitzgebel’s groundbreaking book, Describing Inner Experience: Proponent Meets Skeptic, examines a research method called Descriptive Experience Sampling (DES). DES, which was developed by Hurlburt and collaborators, works roughly as follows. An investigator gives a subject a random beeper. During the day, as the subject hears a beep, she writes a description of her conscious experience just before the beep. The next day, the investigator interviews the subject, asks for more details, corrects any apparent mistakes made by the subject, and draws conclusions about the subject’s mind. Throughout the book, Schwitzgebel challenges some of Hurlburt’s specific conclusions. Yet both agree – and so do I – that DES is a worthy method.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
E. J. Bond (2005). Does the Subject of Experience Exist in the World? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 71 (1):124-133.
Russell T. Hurlburt & Sarah A. Akhter (2006). The Descriptive Experience Sampling Method. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 5 (3-4):271-301.
John Sutton (2011). Time, Experience, and Descriptive Experience Sampling. Journal of Consciousness Studies 18 (1):118-129.
Russell Hurlburt & Eric Schwitzgebel (2007). Part Two The Interviews. In Describing Inner Experience? Proponent Meets Skeptic. MIT Press
Gualtiero Piccinini (2008). Review of Russell T. Hurlburt, Eric Schwitzgebel, Describing Inner Experience? Proponent Meets Skeptic. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2008 (4).
Eric Schwitzgebel (2007). Describing Inner Experience? Conclusion. In Describing Inner Experience? Proponent Meets Skeptic.
Gualtiero Piccinini (2003). Epistemic Divergence and the Publicity of Scientific Methods. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 34 (3):597-612.
Gualtiero Piccinini (forthcoming). Scientific Methods Ought to Be Public, and Descriptive Experience Sampling is One of Them. Journal of Consciousness Studies 18 (1).
Added to index2010-05-22
Total downloads22 ( #181,592 of 1,934,511 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #195,826 of 1,934,511 )
How can I increase my downloads?