The one story: A critique of David Kelsey's theological robotics

Modern Theology 27 (1):26-40 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this article I argue that David Kelsey's approach to theological anthropology is problematic. I argue that a narrative basis proves inadequate to establish the doctrine of the Trinity and its relationship to human beings. Similarly, a Reformed humanist starting point, together with a Reformed extrinsicist account of revelation, I argue, cannot arrive at an orthodox Christology or an account of humanity as a divine gift. By bypassing ontology in favour of narrative and positivity, Kelsey is ironically forced to deny the truth of many passages of the Bible, especially the opening of Genesis, and to reject the Biblical doctrine of the image of God in humanity

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Messiaen and Deleuze.Catherine Pickstock - 2008 - Theory, Culture and Society 25 (7-8):173-199.
Story and Story-World.Amos N. Wilder - 1983 - Interpretation 37 (4):353-364.
Aquinas and Barth on the human body.David H. Kelsey - 1986 - The Thomist 50 (4):643-689.
Principle, Story, and Myth in the Liturgical Search for Identity.Lawrence A. Hoffman - 2010 - Interpretation: A Journal of Bible and Theology 64 (3):231-244.
God and Teleology: Must God have only one ‘Eternal Purpose’?David H. Kelsey - 2012 - Neue Zeitschrift für Systematicsche Theologie Und Religionsphilosophie 54 (4).

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-01

Downloads
17 (#824,750)

6 months
1 (#1,478,435)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references