Graduate studies at Western
Minds and Machines 5 (3):309-337 (1995)
|Abstract||It is often assumed that cognitive science is built upon folk psychology, and that challenges to folk psychology are therefore challenges to cognitive science itself. We argue that, in practice, cognitive science and folk psychology treat entirely non-overlapping domains: cognitive science considers aspects of mental life which do not depend on general knowledge, whereas folk psychology considers aspects of mental life which do depend on general knowledge. We back up our argument on theoretical grounds, and also illustrate the separation between cognitive scientific and folk psychological phenomena in a number of cognitive domains. We consider the methodological and theoretical significance of our arguments for cognitive science research|
|Keywords||Cognitive Science Folk Psychology Knowledge Psychology Science|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Andy Clark (1987). From Folk Psychology to Naive Psychology. Cognitive Science 11 (2):139-54.
Ian Ravenscroft, Folk Psychology as a Theory. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
A. Goldman (1993). The Psychology of Folk Psychology. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16:15-28.
Alvin Goldman (1993). Consciousness, Folk Psychology, and Cognitive Science. Consciousness and Cognition 2 (4):364-382.
Peter Godfrey-Smith (2005). Folk Psychology as a Model. Philosophers' Imprint 5 (6):1-16.
Shaun Nichols & Stephen P. Stich (1994). Folk Psychology. Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science.
William E. Morris & Robert C. Richardson (1995). How Not to Demarcate Cognitive Science and Folk Psychology: A Response to Pickering and Chater. [REVIEW] Minds and Machines 5 (3):339-355.
Frances Egan (1995). Folk Psychology and Cognitive Architecture. Philosophy of Science 62 (2):179-96.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads38 ( #35,977 of 740,333 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #26,535 of 740,333 )
How can I increase my downloads?