David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
International Philosophical Quarterly 43 (1):29-42 (2003)
It is often argued that a study of the history of philosophy is not itself philosophical. Philosophy, it is claimed, is an active, productive enterprise, whereas history is taken to be imitative and therefore passive. My aim in this paper is to argue against this view of the history of philosophy. First, I describe a famous criticism of historians of philosophy—Kant’s critique of the “spirit of imitation.” I claim that the source of this criticism is the received view of mimesis. Since the received view has been widely discredited, I propose a different one—one that sees imitation not as passive but as active. Finally, I suggest that adopting this new view of mimesis demands that we rethink what it means for a history of philosophy to be true. And I propose that the philosophical hermeneutics of Hans-Georg Gadamer might help us to do so
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Flemming Lebech (2006). The Concept of the Subject in the Philosophical Hermeneutics of Hans-Georg Gadamer. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 14 (2):221 – 236.
Tom Huhn (1996). The Movement of Mimesis: Heidegger's 'Origin of the Work of Art' in Relation to Adorno and Lyotard. Philosophy and Social Criticism 22 (4):45-69.
Daniel L. Tate (2008). Transforming Mimesis. Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 13 (1):185-208.
Robert Piercey (2005). Gadamer on the Relation Between Philosophy and Its History. Idealistic Studies 35 (1):21-33.
Kendall L. Walton (1990). Mimesis as Make-Believe: On the Foundations of the Representational Arts. Harvard University Press.
Jeffrey Anthony Mitscherling (2006). The Image of a Second Sun: Plato on Poetry, Rhetoric, and the Technē of Mimēsis. Humanity Books.
Andrew E. Benjamin (1991). Art, Mimesis, and the Avant-Garde: Aspects of a Philosophy of Difference. Routledge.
Risto Pitkänen (2010). Art and its History. Nordic Journal of Aesthetics 21 (39).
Elaine P. Miller (2008). Negativity, Iconoclasm, Mimesis: Kristeva and Benjamin on Political Art. Idealistic Studies 38 (1/2):55-74.
Atsuko Tsuji (2010). Experience in the Very Moment of Writing: Reconsidering Walter Benjamin's Theory of Mimesis. Journal of Philosophy of Education 44 (1):125-136.
Juhani Pietarinen (2009). Plato's Dualism : The Cosmos as Active and Passive Power. In Juhani Pietarinen & Valtteri Viljanen (eds.), The World as Active Power: Studies in the History of European Reason. Brill.
D. W. Lucas (1968). Mimesis Güron Sörbom: Mimesis and Art. Studies in the Origin and Early Development of an Aesthetic Vocabulary. Pp. 218. Stockholm: Svenska Bokförlaget, 1966. Paper, Kr. 42. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 18 (02):190-192.
Mark A. Cheetham (2001). Kant, Art, and Art History: Moments of Discipline. Cambridge University Press.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2011-12-02
Total downloads2 ( #348,863 of 1,100,913 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #177,300 of 1,100,913 )
How can I increase my downloads?