Mind and Language 25 (3):247-278 (2010)
|Abstract||I argue that linguistic meanings are instructions to build monadic concepts that lie between lexicalizable concepts and truth-evaluable judgments. In acquiring words, humans use concepts of various adicities to introduce concepts that can be fetched and systematically combined via certain conjunctive operations, which require monadic inputs. These concepts do not have Tarskian satisfaction conditions. But they provide bases for refinements and elaborations that can yield truth-evaluable judgments. Constructing mental sentences that are true or false requires cognitive work, not just an exercise of basic linguistic capacities|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Vittorio Gallese & George Lakoff, The Brain's Concepts: The Role of the Sensory-Motor System in Conceptual Knowledge.
Philip R. Loockvane (ed.) (1999). The Nature of Concepts: Evolution, Structure, and Representation. Routledge.
Jerry Fodor & Ernie Lepore (2001). Why Compositionality Won't Go Away: Reflections on Horwich's 'Deflationary' Theory. Ratio 14 (4):350–368.
Jonathan Schaffer (2001). Causes as Probability Raisers of Processes. Journal of Philosophy 98 (2):75-92.
Colin Allen (1998). Animal Concepts. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (1):66-66.
Paul Pietrowski (2007). Systematicity Via Monadicity. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 7 (3):343-374.
Katja Wiemer-Hastings & Arthur C. Graesser (1999). Perceiving Abstract Concepts. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (4):635-636.
Paul Horwich (2010). Truth-Meaning-Reality. Oxford University Press.
Grant R. Gillett (1987). Concepts, Structures, and Meanings. Inquiry 30 (March):101-112.
Michael Glanzberg (2011). Meaning, Concepts, and the Lexicon. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 11 (1):1-29.
Added to index2010-05-27
Total downloads63 ( #15,073 of 556,837 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,847 of 556,837 )
How can I increase my downloads?