David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 82 (3):463-479 (2008)
Like Husserl and Heidegger, Ricoeur offers a powerful and original account of what the “world” is and how it conditions our thinking. But it is difficult to recognize Ricoeur’s contributions unless we view them in relation to another aspect of his work: his post-Hegelian Kantianism. Ricoeur tries to steer a middle course between Kant’s and Hegel’s views on this topic. He thinks the idea of the world plays a crucial role in regulating experience, but he tries to understand this idea in a way that is concrete without being totalizing. Ricoeur’s theory of narrative does exactly this. It describes how narratives open up worlds for their readers:sets of specific existential possibilities that may be incorporated into readers’ lives. When Ricoeur’s account of narrative is viewed in relation to Kant and Hegel, itsheds valuable new light on many aspects of his work
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Kevin J. Vanhoozer (1990). Biblical Narrative in the Philosophy of Paul Ricoeur: A Study in Hermeneutics and Theology. Cambridge University Press.
Jane Chamberlain (2002). Thinking Time. Journal of Philosophical Research 27:281-299.
Arto Laitinen (2002). Charles Taylor and Paul Ricoeur on Self-Interpretations and Narrative Identity. In Rauno Huttunen, Hannu Heikkinen & Leena Syrjälä (eds.), Narrative Research. Voices of Teachers and Philosophers. SoPhi 57-71.
Paul Ricœur & Richard Kearney (eds.) (1996). Paul Ricoeur: The Hermeneutics of Action. Sage Publications.
Robert Piercey (2004). Ricoeur's Account of Tradition and the Gadamer–Habermas Debate. Human Studies 27 (3):259-280.
Henry I. Venema, Paul Ricoeur's Interpretation of Selfhood and its Significance for Philosophy of Religion.
Paul Ricœur (2007). Jan Patočka. Studia Phaenomenologica 7:193-200.
Simon Beck (2006). Fiction and Fictions: On Ricoeur on the Route to the Self. South African Journal of Philosophy 25 (4):329-335.
S. H. Clark (1990). Paul Ricoeur. Routledge.
Stephanie Theodorou (2007). Two Theories of Ontological Disclosure. The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 12:77-83.
Farhang Erfani (2009). We Are Not Saints, But We Have Kept Our Appointment. Idealistic Studies 39 (1/3):115-123.
Jeffrey Andrew Barash (2010). The Place of Remembrance: Reflections on Paul Ricoeur's Theory of Collective Memory. In Brian Treanor & Henry Isaac Venema (eds.), A Passion for the Possible: Thinking with Paul Ricoeur. Fordham University Press
Janet Donohoe (2009). Where Were You When ... ? Philosophy in the Contemporary World 16 (1):105-113.
Fernanda Henriques (2005). Paul Ricoeur leitor e herdeiro de Kant. Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 61 (2):593 - 607.
Added to index2011-01-09
Total downloads16 ( #220,559 of 1,792,926 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #170,535 of 1,792,926 )
How can I increase my downloads?