David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Perspectives on Science 14 (2):127-152 (2006)
: This paper discusses the American scientist and philosopher Charles S. Peirce's (1839–1914) classification of the sciences from the contemporary perspective of interdisciplinary studies. Three theses are defended: (1) Studies on interdisciplinarity pertain to the intermediate class of Peirce's classification of all science, the sciences of review (retrospective science), ranking below the sciences of discovery (heuretic sciences) and above practical science (the arts). (2) Scientific research methods adopted by interdisciplinary inquiries are cross-categorial. Making them converge to an increasing extent with the sciences of discovery, especially the methodeutic of normative logic, is one of the future challenges for studies on interdisciplinarity. (3) The overall structure of Peirce's classification, were it to be applied in today's situation, would not, in any major respect, be radically different from what it was designed to reflect a hundred years ago, in spite of the virtually exponential creation and production of new domains and the massive increase in investment in research and scientific publication. Accordingly, charges that the sciences of discovery are becoming ever more fragmented are not new.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Miquel Forcada (2006). Ibn Bajja and the Classification of the Sciences in Al-Andalus. Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 16 (2):287-307.
John Sutton (2004). Representation, Reduction, and Interdisciplinarity in the Sciences of Memory. In Hugh Clapin (ed.), Representation in Mind. Elsevier. 187--216.
Cornelis De Waal (2005). Why Metaphysics Needs Logic and Mathematics Doesn't: Mathematics, Logic, and Metaphysics in Peirce's Classification of the Sciences. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 41 (2):283 - 297.
Ladislav Tondl (1998). What is the Thematic Structure of Science? Journal for General Philosophy of Science 29 (2):245-264.
Fee-Alexandra Haase, Peirce's Law of Triviality: The Implementation of the Trivium of Logic, Rhetoric, and Grammar; Basic Categories for Linguistics and Literature Studies From a Universal Semiotic Theory.
Helmut Pape (1993). Final Causality in Peirce's Semiotics and His Classification of the Sciences. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 29 (4):581 - 607.
Jaime Nubiola (2005). Abduction or the Logic of Surprise. Semiotica 153 (1/4):117-130.
David Alvargonzález (2011). Multidisciplinarity, Interdisciplinarity, Transdisciplinarity, and the Sciences. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 25 (4):387-403.
Jaime Nubiola (2005). The Classification of the Sciences and Cross-Disciplinarity. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 41 (2):271-282.
Richard Kenneth Atkins (2006). Restructuring the Sciences: Peirce's Categories and His Classifications of the Sciences. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 42 (4):483-500.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads14 ( #120,567 of 1,102,037 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #128,871 of 1,102,037 )
How can I increase my downloads?