Irony and Shame in Socratic Ethics
International Philosophical Quarterly 50 (4):473-488 (2010)
| Abstract | Socrates is both the first thoroughgoing moral philosopher and the first to employ irony as a philosophical tool. These innovative and foundational aspects of Socratic philosophy, however, lead to apparent inconsistencies and worrisome interactions. Socrates is charged with making his interlocutors look foolish, arrogant, self-serving, or ignorant. Worse still, he seems aware of these reactions. If Socrates knows his methods stir resentment, why does he continue with them? Furthermore, how should we view irony in light of Socratic ethics? I argue that Socrates uses irony and shame to bring about the desire for moral improvement. Socratic irony is of the riddling variety and the shame that it produces is not intended to belittle the interlocutor’s sense of self. Instead, shame is an appropriate response to the realization that one’s life is unexamined and possibly vicious. Therefore, the real problem with Socratic irony lies not with its use, but its failure rate | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,882 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesPaul Muench (2009). Socratic Irony, Plato's Apology, and Kierkegaard's On the Concept of Irony. In Niels Jørgen Cappelørn, Hermann Deuser & K. Brian Söderquist (eds.), Kierkegaard Studies Yearbook. de Gruyter.
Christopher Lauer (2009). Kierkegaard and Aristophanes on the Suspension of Irony. Idealistic Studies 39 (1/3):125-136.
Peter Boghossian (2011). Socratic Pedagogy: Perplexity, Humiliation, Shame and a Broken Egg. Educational Philosophy and Theory 44 (7):710-720.
Eric C. Mullis (2009). On Being a Socratic Philosophy Instructor. Teaching Philosophy 32 (4):345-359.
Brad Frazier (2004). Kierkegaard on Mastered Irony. International Philosophical Quarterly 44 (4):465-479.
Paul Muench (2006). Kierkegaard's Socratic Task. Dissertation, University of Pittsburgh
Jonathan Fine (2011). Laughing to Learn: Irony in the Republic as Pedagogy. Polis 28 (2):235-49.
Ulrika Carlsson (2010). Love as a Problem of Knowledge in Kierkegaard's Either/Or and Plato's Symposium. Inquiry 53 (1):41-67.
Søren Kierkegaard (1966/1983). The Concept of Irony: With Constant Reference to Socrates. Octagon Books.
Michael L. Morgan (2008). On Shame. Routledge.
Brad Frazier (2004). Kierkegaard on the Problems of Pure Irony. Journal of Religious Ethics 32 (3):417 - 447.
Paul Muench (2006; rev. 2009). Kierkegaard's Socratic Point of View. In Sara Ahbel-Rappe & Rachana Kamtekar (eds.), A Companion to Socrates. Blackwell.
Ruth L. Smith (1998). Morals and Their Ironies. Journal of Religious Ethics 26 (2):367 - 388.
Winfield E. Nagley (1980). Kierkegaard's Early and Later View of Socratic Irony. Thought 55 (3):271-282.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2011-01-09Total downloads13 ( #89,098 of 556,914 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,931 of 556,914 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
