David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
International Philosophical Quarterly 50 (3):335-349 (2010)
This paper describes and evaluates two different ways of doing philosophy: a “reflexive” approach that sees metaphilosophical inquiry as fundamental, and a “nonreflexive” approach that sees metaphilosophy as dispensable. It examines arguments that have been advanced for these approaches by Gilbert Ryle, Jerry Fodor, and Richard Rorty, and claims that none of these arguments are convincing. Finally, the paper draws on Alasdair MacIntyre’s work to propose a different way of choosing between the approaches, one that asks which approach is more successful at making its appeal intelligible to the other. From this perspective, the reflexive approach appears to have an important advantage over its rival
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Yuri Cath, Metaphilosophy. Oxford Bibliographies Online.
Georg Brutian (2012). Metaphilosophy in the Systems of Metatheories. Metaphilosophy 43 (3):294-305.
David Rondel (2011). On Rorty's Evangelical Metaphilosophy. Philosophy and Rhetoric 44 (2):150-170.
Terrell Ward Bynum (2011). Creating the Journal Metaphilosophy. Metaphilosophy 42 (3):186-190.
Paul Thagard & Craig Beam (2004). Epistemological Metaphors and the Nature of Philosophy. Metaphilosophy 35 (4):504-516.
Maurice Cohen (1977). Contextual Analysis: An Approach to the Study of Philosophic Arguments. Metaphilosophy 8 (1):3–20.
Vivien Schmidt (1988). The Historical Approach to Philosophy of Science Toulmin in Perspective. Metaphilosophy 19 (3-4):223-236.
Robert Piercey (2009). The Uses of the Past From Heidegger to Rorty: Doing Philosophy Historically. Cambridge University Press.
Christopher Toner (2008). Sorts of Naturalism: Requirements for a Successful Theory. Metaphilosophy 39 (2):220–250.
Cameron Stewart (2011). Futility Determination as a Process: Problems with Medical Sovereignty, Legal Issues and the Strengths and Weakness of the Procedural Approach. [REVIEW] Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 8 (2):155-163.
James F. Harris (1980). A New Approach to Teaching Introductory Philosophy. Metaphilosophy 11 (3-4):326-330.
Richard Double (1996). Metaphilosophy and Free Will. Oxford University Press.
Stefano Predelli (2006). The Problem with Token-Reflexivity. Synthese 148 (1):5 - 29.
Ronald H. Epp (1974). A Hierarchy of Values: An Approach to the Teaching of Philosophy. Metaphilosophy 5 (2):163–168.
Added to index2011-12-02
Total downloads11 ( #138,953 of 1,102,993 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #84,821 of 1,102,993 )
How can I increase my downloads?