Human Studies 27 (3):259-280 (2004)
|Abstract||While it is clear that the Gadamer–Habermas debate has had a major influence on Paul Ricoeur, his commentators have had little to say about the nature of this influence. I try to remedy this silence by showing that Ricoeur''s account of tradition is a direct response to the Gadamer–Habermas debate. First, I briefly explain the debate''s importance and describe Ricoeur''s reaction to it. Next, I show how his discussion of tradition in Time and Narrative steers a middle course between Gadamerian hermeneutics and Habermasian Ideologiekritik. Finally, I raise some critical questions about the adequacy of Ricoeur''s middle course. Specifically, I argue that it rests on an implausible distinction between the form and the content of tradition.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Devrim Sezer (2006). Tradition and Dialogue in Gadamer, Heidegger and Habermas. The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 2:105-110.
Alan K. L. Chan (2000). Confucian Ethics and the Critique of Ideology. Asian Philosophy 10 (3):245 – 261.
Paul Ricœur & Richard Kearney (eds.) (1996). Paul Ricoeur: The Hermeneutics of Action. Sage Publications.
Francisco J. Gonzalez (2006). Dialectic and Dialogue in the Hermeneutics of Paul Ricœur and H.G. Gadamer. Continental Philosophy Review 39 (3):313-345.
I. I. I. Mootz, Gadamer's Rhetorical Conception of Hermeneutics as the Key to Developing a Critical Hermeneutics.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads41 ( #32,626 of 722,703 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,247 of 722,703 )
How can I increase my downloads?