A Transcendental Philosophy of Science

Philosophy Now 66:48 (2008)
Can there be a transcendental philosophy of science? What would it be good for?
Keywords philosophy of science  transcendentalism  continental philosophy
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI philnow20086686
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive Massimo Pigliucci, A Transcendental Philosophy of Science
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Paul Ennis (2011). The Transcendental Core of Correlationism. Cosmos and History: The Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy 7 (1):37-48.
Sami Pihlström & Arto Siitonen (2005). The Transcendental Method and (Post-)Empiricist Philosophy of Science. Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 36 (1):81 - 106.
Daniel Dahlstrom (2005). Heidegger's Transcendentalism. Research in Phenomenology 35 (1):29-54.
Alexander Schnell (2012). Speculative Foundations of Phenomenology. Continental Philosophy Review 45 (3):461-479.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

83 ( #40,497 of 1,726,249 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

12 ( #56,985 of 1,726,249 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.