David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Nature 417 (598):599 (2002)
Living organisms are caught between a hammer and an anvil, evolutionarily speaking. On the one hand, they need to buffer the influences of genetic mutations and environmental stresses if they are to develop normally and maintain a coherent and functional form. On the other, stabiliz- ing one’s development too much may mean not being able to respond at all to changes in the environment and starting down the primrose path to extinction. On page 618 of this issue, Queitsch et al.1 propose that, in plants, the balance between stability and the potential for change is made possible in part through a protein involved in ‘heat- shock responses’ in a wide variety of species, from plants to insects.
|Keywords||epigenetics evolutionary buffers|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
José-Leonel Torres & Lynn Trainor (2008). On Organism: Environment Buffers and Their Ecological Significance. Biology and Philosophy 23 (3):403-416.
Kai Shu, Hou H. Huang & Pei G. Luo (2011). Is the Buffer Mechanism Universal in Biological Evolution? World Futures 67 (3):213 - 216.
Massimo Pigliucci (2003). Epigenetic is Back! Cell Cycle 2 (1):34-35.
David P. Hunt (2007). Black the Libertarian. Acta Analytica 22 (1):3-15.
Joe Peters (1998). Transforming the Integrated Conservation and Development Project (ICDP) Approach: Observations From the Ranomafana National Park Project, Madagascar. [REVIEW] Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 11 (1):17-47.
Javier Laborde (2008). The Landscape Approach. Environmental Ethics 30 (3):251-262.
Roberta L. Millstein (2007). Hsp90-Induced Evolution: Adaptationist, Neutralist, and Developmentalist Scenarios. Biological Theory: Integrating Development, Evolution and Cognition 2 (4):376-386.
Massimo Pigliucci (2001). Phenotypic Plasticity: Beyond Nature and Nurture. Johns Hopkins University Press.
Christopher Evan Franklin (2011). Neo-Frankfurtians and Buffer Cases: The New Challenge to the Principle of Alternative Possibilities. Philosophical Studies 152 (2):189–207.
Jason Scott Robert (2002). How Developmental is Evolutionary Developmental Biology? Biology and Philosophy 17 (5):591-611.
Massimo Pigliucci (2005). Expanding Evolution. [REVIEW] Nature 435:565-566.
H.-P. Lipp (2000). Big Brains as Shelters for Odd Genes: How Fast Does Complex Behavior Evolve? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (1):155-156.
Massimo Pigliucci (2003). Genetic Assimilation and a Possible Evolutionary Paradox: Can Macroevolution Sometimes Be so Fast to Pass Us By? Evolution 57 (7):1455-1464.
Added to index2012-06-07
Total downloads40 ( #83,639 of 1,726,249 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #118,705 of 1,726,249 )
How can I increase my downloads?