Do extraordinary claims really require extraordinary evidence?
In K. Frazier (ed.), Science Under Siege: Defending Science, Exposing Pseudoscience. Prometheus (2009)
| Abstract | To what extend does David Hume's argument about miracles inform modern skepticism about pseudoscience? | |||||||||
| Keywords | Hume miracles pseudoscience | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
  |
| External links | This entry has no external links. Add one. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesRobert Hambourger (1987). Need Miracles Be Extraordinary? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 47 (3):435-449.
Dennis M. Ahern (1975). Hume on the Evidential Impossibility of Miracles. American Philosophical Quarterly:1 - 31.
J. C. A. Gaskin (1985). Contrary Miracles Concluded. Hume Studies (Supplement):1 - 14.
Richard Otte (2004). Review of Fogelin, A Defense of Hume on Miracles. [REVIEW] Hume Studies 30 (1):165-68.
Bruce Langtry (1985). Miracles and Rival Systems of Religion. Sophia 24:21 - 31.
John Earman (1993). Bayes, Hume, and Miracles. Faith and Philosophy 10 (3):293-310.
John Earman (2000). Hume's Abject Failure: The Argument Against Miracles. Oxford University Press.
Norman L. Geisler (2001). Replies to Evan Fales: On Miracles & the Modern Mind. Philosophia Christi 3 (1):39 - 42.
Chris Slupik (1995). A New Interpretation of Hume's 'Of Miracles'. Religious Studies 31 (4):517 - 536.
S. Buckle (2001). Marvels, Miracles, and Mundane Order. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 79 (1):1 – 31.
Peter Harrison (1999). Prophecy, Early Modern Apologetics, and Hume's Argument Against Miracles. Journal of the History of Ideas 60 (2):241 - 256.
James E. Taylor (2007). Hume on Miracles: Interpretation and Criticism. Philosophy Compass 2 (4):611–624.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2012-06-07Total downloads23 ( #53,763 of 548,984 )Recent downloads (6 months)13 ( #4,933 of 548,984 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
