Hume on Is and Ought

New York: Palgrave-Macmillan (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This collection of essays showcases recent work on Hume and the Is/Ought question. There are four distinct attempts to redefine and prove Hume's no-ought-from-is thesis in such a way as to evade the famous counterexamples of A.N. Prior. The rival approaches are explained and discussed together with their implications for meta-ethical theory" --Provided by publisher.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,221

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Is Hume inconsistent? : motivation and morals.Norva Y. S. Lo - 2009 - In Charles R. Pigden (ed.), Hume on Motivation and Virtue. Palgrave-Macmillan. pp. 57.
The motivation argument for non-cognitivism.Michael Smith - 2009 - In Charles R. Pigden (ed.), Hume on Motivation and Virtue. Palgrave-Macmillan. pp. 105.
Two kinds of normativity : Korsgaard v. Hume.Luke Russell - 2009 - In Charles R. Pigden (ed.), Hume on Motivation and Virtue. Palgrave-Macmillan. pp. 208.
What kind of virtue theorist is Hume?Christine Swanton - 2009 - In Charles R. Pigden (ed.), Hume on Motivation and Virtue. Palgrave-Macmillan.
Hume on Justice.Rosalind Hursthouse - 2009 - In Charles R. Pigden (ed.), Hume on Motivation and Virtue. Palgrave-Macmillan. pp. 264.
Hume on motivation and virtue.Charles Pigden (ed.) - 2009 - New York: Palgrave-Macmillan.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-05-19

Downloads
18 (#708,051)

6 months
4 (#315,908)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references