Review - What Should I Believe? [Book Review]
|Abstract||Dorothy Rowe's book amounts to a spectacularly missed chance to make a significant contribution to the very important questions the author set out to address. The book promises to provide an answer to "why our beliefs about the nature of death and the purpose of life dominate our lives," but ends up being a bizarre hodgepodge of self-help psychology, uninformative case studies, and a large number of disconnected personal observations -- the whole thing peppered here and there with philosophical and even political considerations.|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Alvin Plantinga (2001). Rationality and Public Evidence: A Reply to Richard Swinburne. Religious Studies 37 (2):215-222.
Bart Streumer (2007). Review of Ingmar Persson, The Retreat of Reason: A Dilemma in the Philosophy of Life. [REVIEW] Times Literary Supplement (9 November).
Lisa Bortolotti (2009). Delusions and Other Irrational Beliefs. Oxford University Press.
Nir Friedman & Joseph Y. Halpern (1999). Belief Revision: A Critique. [REVIEW] Journal of Logic, Language and Information 8 (4):401-420.
Andrew Reisner & Asbjørn Steglich-Petersen (eds.) (2011). Reasons for Belief. Cambridge University Press.
David J. Owens (2003). Does Belief Have an Aim? Philosophical Studies 115 (3):283-305.
Daniel Greco (2012). The Impossibility of Skepticism. Philosophical Review 121 (3):317-358.
Robin Tapley (2012). Humour, Beliefs, and Prejudice. Southwest Philosophy Review 28 (1):85-92.
Jonathan Kvanvig (1986). How to Be a Reliabilist. American Philosophical Quarterly 23 (2):189 - 198.
Brian P. McLaughlin (1990). Incontinent Belief. Journal of Philosophical Research 15:115-126.
Roberta L. Millstein (2006). Discussion of "Four Case Studies on Chance in Evolution&Quot;: Philosophical Themes and Questions. Philosophy of Science 73 (5):678-687.
Brad Armendt (2010). Stakes and Beliefs. Philosophical Studies 147 (1):71 - 87.
Aaron Smuts (2010). The Ghost is the Thing: Can Fiction Reveal Audience Belief? Midwest Studies in Philosophy 34 (1):219-239.
Michael Bergmann (2006). Epistemic Circularity and Common Sense: A Reply to Reed. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 73 (1):198–207.
Added to index2011-03-22
Total downloads12 ( #101,123 of 722,826 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,541 of 722,826 )
How can I increase my downloads?