David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Bioethics 25 (4):202-208 (2011)
In this paper I examine the debate between ‘protectionists’ and ‘liberationists’ concerning the appropriate role of minors in decision-making about their health care, focusing particularly on disagreements between the two sides regarding adolescents. Protectionists advocate a more traditional, paternalistic approach in which minors have relatively little input into the healthcare decision-making process, and decisions are made for them by parents or other adults, guided by a commitment to the patient's best interests. Liberationists, on the other hand, argue in favour of expanded participation by minors in treatment decisions, and decision-making authority for at least some adolescents. My examination of the debate includes discussion of liberationist shifts that have taken place in the medical community as well as in legal policy and practice, and consideration of recent research on adolescent development. In the final section of the paper, I propose a moderate position that addresses both liberationist and protectionist concerns
|Keywords||protectionist pediatric liberationist decisional capacity adolescent|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Irma M. Hein, Pieter W. Troost, Alice Broersma, Martine C. De Vries, Joost G. Daams & Ramón J. L. Lindauer (2015). Why is It Hard to Make Progress in Assessing Children’s Decision-Making Competence? BMC Medical Ethics 16 (1):1.
Claudia Wiesemann (2012). Autonomie als Bezugspunkt einer universalen Medizinethik. Ethik in der Medizin 24 (4):287-295.
Jessica Flanigan (2013). Adderall for All: A Defense of Pediatric Neuroenhancement. HEC Forum 25 (4):325-344.
Brian Partridge (2014). Adolescent Pediatric Decision-Making: A Critical Reconsideration in the Light of the Data. HEC Forum 26 (4):299-308.
Similar books and articles
Lars Sandman, Bradi B. Granger, Inger Ekman & Christian Munthe (2011). Adherence, Shared Decision-Making and Patient Autonomy. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 15 (2):115-127.
Rogeer Hoedemaekers & Wim Dekkers (2003). Justice and Solidarity in Priority Setting in Health Care. Health Care Analysis 11 (4):325-343.
Fiona Randall (1996). Palliative Care Ethics: A Good Companion. Oxford University Press.
H. U. I. Edwin, W. U. Dorian, Sau-Ying Chiu & Suet-kam Shum (2011). Adolescent and Parental Perceptions of Medical Decision-Making in Hong Kong. Bioethics 25 (9):516-526.
Allen E. Buchanan (1989). Deciding for Others: The Ethics of Surrogate Decisionmaking. Cambridge University Press.
Kath M. Melia (2004). Health Care Ethics: Lessons From Intensive Care. Sage Publications.
H. U. I. Edwin (2011). Adolescent and Parental Perceptions of Medical Decision-Making in Hong Kong. Bioethics 25 (9):516-526.
Insoo Hyun (2000). When Adolescents "Mismanage" Their Chronic Medical Conditions: An Ethical Exploration. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 10 (2):147-163.
B. C. Partridge (2010). Adolescent Psychological Development, Parenting Styles, and Pediatric Decision Making. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 35 (5):518-525.
Added to index2009-08-27
Total downloads21 ( #154,175 of 1,781,268 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #167,843 of 1,781,268 )
How can I increase my downloads?