Ending the Mendel–Fisher Controversy [Book Review]

Isis 100:173-174 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1086/599674

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Ending the Mendel-Fisher Controversy.Allan Franklin, A. W. F. Edwards, Daniel J. Fairbanks, Daniel L. Hartl & Teddy Seidenfeld - 2008 - Journal of the History of Biology 41 (4):775-777.
Statistics is not enough: revisiting Ronald A. Fisher's critique (1936) of Mendel's experimental results (1866).Avital Pilpel - 2007 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 38 (3):618-626.
P's in a pod: Some recipes for cooking Mendel's data.Teddy Seidenfeld - unknown
THE HYBRIDIZATION WORK OF MENDEL, 102 YEARS AFTER STARTING THE CONTROVERSY.Rafael María Román-Bravo, Rogelio Garcidueñas-Piña, Ruy Ortiz-Rodríguez, Atilio Miguel Atencio-León, Luis Fabian Yáñez-Cuéllar & Jose Atilio Aranguren-Méndez - 2014 - Revista Cientifica, FCV-LUZ 24 (1):38-46.
Models and statistical inference: The controversy between Fisher and neyman–pearson.Johannes Lenhard - 2006 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 57 (1):69-91.
Science studies and Mendel's paradigm.Vítězslav Orel - 2010 - Perspectives on Science 18 (2):pp. 226-241.
The persistence of the R.A. Fisher-Sewall Wright controversy.Robert A. Skipper - 2002 - Biology and Philosophy 17 (3):341-367.
The R. A. Fisher-Sewall Wright Controversy in Philosophical Focus: Theory Evaluation in Population Genetics.Robert Alan Skipper - 2000 - Dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park
Controversies in the Interpretation of Mendel's Discovery.Vítĕzslav Orel & Daniel L. Hartl - 1994 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 16 (3):423 - 464.
History of Plant Hybridization According to Mendel's Contemporary Rudolf Geschwind.Vítězslav Orel - 1986 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 8 (2):251 - 263.
The real objective of Mendel's paper: A response to Monaghan and Corcos. [REVIEW]Raphael Falk & Sahotra Sarkar - 1991 - Biology and Philosophy 6 (4):447-451.
What would have happened if Darwin had known Mendel (or Mendel's work)?Pablo Lorenzano - 2011 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 33 (1):3-48.
Autobiographia iuvenulia. Ad centesimum quinquagesimum J. G. Mendel natalem by Gregorii Mendel; Josef Sajner. [REVIEW]John Berg - 1973 - Isis 64:134-134.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-01-31

Downloads
10 (#1,168,820)

6 months
2 (#1,240,909)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references