Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):490-490 (2001)
|Abstract||To account for category-specific semantic deficits, Humphreys and Forde propose to fractionate semantic memory into multiple sensory and functional knowledge stores. There are reasons to doubt the empirical productivity of this proposal, unless theoretically motivated principles of distinguishing and weighting the different kinds of object knowledge can be spelled out in detail.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Marzia Soavi (2009). Antirealism and Artefact Kinds. Techné 13 (2):93-107.
Jennifer Hornsby & Jason Stanley (2005). I-Paper by Jennifer Hornsby. Semantic Knowledge and Practical Knowledge. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 79 (1):107–130.
Bradford Mahon & Alfonso Caramazza (2001). The Sensory/Functional Assumption or the Data: Which Do We Keep? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):488-489.
Lorraine K. Tyler & Helen E. Moss (2001). Concepts and Categories: What is the Evidence for Neural Specialisation? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):495-496.
Glyn W. Humphreys & Emer M. E. Forde (2001). Category Specificity in Mind and Brain? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):497-504.
Kent Johnson (2003). Are There Semantic Natural Kinds of Words? Mind and Language 18 (2):175–193.
Glyn W. Humphreys & Emer M. E. Forde (2001). Hierarchies, Similarity, and Interactivity in Object Recognition: “Category-Specific” Neuropsychological Deficits. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):453-476.
George S. Cree & Ken McRae (2001). Beyond the Sensory/Functional Dichotomy. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):480-481.
Steven Gross (2007). Relating Conscious and Unconscious Semantic Knowledge. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 7 (3):427-445.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads5 ( #160,428 of 549,124 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?