|Abstract||In the context of rising regional instability and conflict, along with increased incidents of global terrorism, in a dynamic, uncertain security environment, emerging nuclear and other weapons of mass destruction threats both state proliferation and terrorism are seen as growing dangers giving rise to increasing global insecurity. The international nuclear nonproliferation regime, the centerpiece of which is the Nuclear Non-proliferation Treaty (NPT), is essential to current and future non-proliferation efforts and needs to be maintained and strengthened, not replaced. The normative and legal weight of the regime is important for counter terrorism as well as non-proliferation, but it will not likely directly affect the behavior of so-called rogue states and terrorists. Preventing them from achieving their objectives if they attempt to wield nuclear and radiological weapons may deter and dissuade them, as may a credible prospect of punishment. The interaction of non-proliferation and deterrence, so clear during the Cold War history of the NPT, remain crucial parts of an increasingly complex picture.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Dieter Janssen (2004). Preventive Defense and Forcible Regime Change: A Normative Assessment. Journal of Military Ethics 3 (2):105-128.
Steven Lee (1995). Nuclear Proliferation and Nuclear Entitlement. Ethics and International Affairs 9 (1):101–131.
Deborah G. Mayo (1983). An Objective Theory of Statistical Testing. Synthese 57 (3):297 - 340.
Deborah G. Mayo (1982). On After-Trial Criticisms of Neyman-Pearson Theory of Statistics. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1982:145 - 158.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads5 ( #169,891 of 722,741 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,247 of 722,741 )
How can I increase my downloads?