Valuing knowledge: A deontological approach [Book Review]
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 12 (4):413 - 428 (2009)
The fact that we ought to prefer what is comparatively more likely to be good, I argue, does, contrary to consequentialism, not rest on any evaluative facts. It is, in this sense, a deontological requirement. As such it is the basis of our valuing those things which are in accordance with it. We value acting (and believing) well, i.e. we value acting (and believing) as we ought to act (and to believe). In this way, despite the fact that our interest in justification depends on our interest in truth, we value believing with justification on non-instrumental grounds. A deontological understanding of justification, thus, solves the Value of Knowledge Problem.
|Keywords||Value of knowledge Epistemic value Consequentialism Virtue epistemology Reliabilism|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Jonathan L. Kvanvig (2003). The Value of Knowledge and the Pursuit of Understanding. Cambridge University Press.
Alvin I. Goldman (1999). Knowledge in a Social World. Oxford University Press.
Ernest Sosa (2007/2009). A Virtue Epistemology. Oxford University Press.
John Broome (1991). Weighing Goods: Equality, Uncertainty and Time. Wiley-Blackwell.
Linda Zagzebski (2003). The Search for the Source of Epistemic Good. Metaphilosophy 34 (1-2):12-28.
Citations of this work BETA
Julien Dutant (2013). In Defence of Swamping. Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 2 (4):357-366.
Similar books and articles
Hamid Vahid (2005). Epistemic Justification and the Skeptical Challenge. Palgrave Macmillan.
Christian Miller (2008). Introduction to Agency Symposium. Ethics 118 (3):385-387.
Colin Cheyne (2009). A Paradox of Justified Believing. Ratio 22 (3):278-290.
Igor Douven (2005). A Contextualist Solution to the Gettier Problem. Grazer Philosophische Studien 69 (1):207-228.
Richard Feldman (2008). Modest Deontologism in Epistemology. Synthese 161 (3):339 - 355.
H. Vahid (1998). Deontic Vs. Nondeontic Conceptions of Epistemic Justification. Erkenntnis 49 (3):285-301.
Michael Bergmann (2000). Deontology and Defeat. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 60 (1):87-102.
Christian Piller (2009). Reliabilist Responses to the Value of Knowledge Problem. Grazer Philosophische Studien 79 (1):121-135.
Added to index2009-07-25
Total downloads37 ( #109,140 of 1,846,881 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #466,493 of 1,846,881 )
How can I increase my downloads?