David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Science and Engineering Ethics 8 (2):191-205 (2002)
The purpose of this paper is to provide a simple yet comprehensive organizing scheme for the responsible conduct of research (RCR). The heuristic offered here should prove helpful in research ethics education, where the many and heterogeneous elements of RCR can be bewildering, as well as research into research integrity and efforts to form RCR policy and regulations. The six domains are scientific integrity, collegiality, protection of human subjects, animal welfare, institutional integrity, and social responsibility.
|Keywords||research ethics education in the responsible conduct of research RCR training|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
David H. Guston (1999). Changing Explanatory Frameworks in the U.S. Government's Attempt to Define Research Misconduct. Science and Engineering Ethics 5 (2):137-154.
Citations of this work BETA
Pamela L. Sankar & Mildred K. Cho (2015). Engineering Values Into Genetic Engineering: A Proposed Analytic Framework for Scientific Social Responsibility. American Journal of Bioethics 15 (12):18-24.
Henk Zandvoort, Tom Børsen, Michael Deneke & Stephanie J. Bird (2013). Editors' Overview Perspectives on Teaching Social Responsibility to Students in Science and Engineering. Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (4):1413-1438.
Hyemin Han (2015). Virtue Ethics, Positive Psychology, and a New Model of Science and Engineering Ethics Education. Science and Engineering Ethics 21 (2):441-460.
Erich Schienke, Seth Baum, Nancy Tuana, Kenneth Davis & Klaus Keller (2011). Intrinsic Ethics Regarding Integrated Assessment Models for Climate Management. Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (3):503-523.
Bjørn Hofmann, Anne Ingeborg Myhr & Søren Holm (2013). Scientific Dishonesty—a Nationwide Survey of Doctoral Students in Norway. BMC Medical Ethics 14 (1):3-.
Similar books and articles
Kligyte Vykinta, T. Marcy Richard, T. Sevier Sydney, S. Godfrey Elaine & D. Mumford Michael (2008). A Qualitative Approach to Responsible Conduct of Research (Rcr) Training Development: Identification of Metacognitive Strategies. Science and Engineering Ethics 14 (1):3-31.
Lynne E. Olson (2010). Developing a Framework for Assessing Responsible Conduct of Research Education Programs. Science and Engineering Ethics 16 (1):185-200.
Lawrence J. Rhoades (2002). Beyond Conflict of Interest: The Responsible Conduct of Research. Science and Engineering Ethics 8 (3):459-468.
Edward J. Hackett (2002). Four Observations About “Six Domains of Research Ethics”. Science and Engineering Ethics 8 (2):211-214.
Sheila Slaughter (2002). Commentary on “Six Domains of Research Ethics”. Science and Engineering Ethics 8 (2):219-222.
Sabrina J. Goodman, Kaori Kubo Germano, Adam L. Fried & Celia B. Fisher (2009). Measures of Mentoring, Department Climate, and Graduate Student Preparedness in the Responsible Conduct of Psychological Research. Ethics and Behavior 19 (3):227-252.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads60 ( #80,303 of 1,902,524 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #147,934 of 1,902,524 )
How can I increase my downloads?