Darwinian Dynamics Implies Developmental Ascendency
Biological Theory 2 (1):113-115 (2007)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,701 |
| External links |
|
| Through your library | Configure |
James A. Coffman & Robert E. Ulanowicz (2007). Ping Ao—Darwinian Dynamics Implies Developmental Ascendency (Biological Theory 2: 113–115, 2007). Biological Theory 2 (2):179-180.
James A. Coffman (2006). Developmental Ascendency: From Bottom-Up to Top-Down Control. Biological Theory 1 (2):165-178.
Paul E. Griffiths (1996). Darwinism, Process Structuralism, and Natural Kinds. Philosophy of Science 63 (3):9.
Bruce H. Weber & David J. Depew (1996). Natural Selection and Self-Organization. Biology and Philosophy 11 (1):33-65.
Stanley N. Salthe (2012). Frameworking Ascendency Increase (a Review of R. E. Ulanowicz, A Third Window: Natural Life Beyond Newton and Darwin. Templeton Foundation Press, 2009). [REVIEW] Axiomathes 22 (2):223-230.
David Leiser (1997). The Dynamics of Cumulative Knowledge. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (1):76-77.
Yuko Munakata, Jamie O. Edgin & Jennifer Merva Stedron (2002). The Best is yet to Come: The Promise of Models of Developmental Disorders. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (6):765-766.
Alexander Laszlo (2009). The Nature of Evolution. World Futures 65 (3):204 – 221.
Bruce H. Weber (2011). Extending and Expanding the Darwinian Synthesis: The Role of Complex Systems Dynamics. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 42 (1):75-81.
Evelyn Fox Keller (2005). DDS: Dynamics of Developmental Systems. Biology and Philosophy 20 (2-3):409-416.
Patrick Bateson (1989). Does Evolutionary Biology Contribute to Ethics? Biology and Philosophy 4 (3):287-301.
Manfred D. Laubichler (2010). Evolutionary Developmental Biology Offers a Significant Challenge to the Neo-Darwinian Paradigm. In Francisco José Ayala & Robert Arp (eds.), Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Biology. Wiley-Blackwell Pub..
Alessandro Minelli (2010). Evolutionary Developmental Biology Does Not Offer a Significant Challenge to the Neo-Darwinian Paradigm. In Francisco José Ayala & Robert Arp (eds.), Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Biology. Wiley-Blackwell Pub..
Robert A. Phillips (2004). Brief Remarks on the Evolutionary Method. The Ruffin Series of the Society for Business Ethics 2004:235-238.
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2010-08-24Total downloads5 ( #160,428 of 549,113 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,361 of 549,113 )How can I increase my downloads? |

