David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy in the Contemporary World 3 (1):14-18 (1996)
This paper criticizes Coliingridge’s arguments against an epistemology of technological control. Collingridge claims that because prediction mechanisms are inadequate, his “dilemma of control” demonstrates that the sociopolitical impact of new technologies cannot be forecasted, and that, consequently, policy makers must concentrate their control measures on minimizing the costs required to alter entrenched technologies. I argue that Collingridge does not show on either horn that forecasting is impossible, and that his criticisms of forecasting methods are self-defeating for they undercut his positive case for the control of entrenched technologies. Finally, I indicate an empirical base for forecasting risk that may define epistemic principles of technology assessment
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Manfred Mai (2003). Technikbewertung Als Instrument der Politischen Gestaltung. �Ber Die Steuerbarkeit Moderner Gesellschaften. Poiesis and Praxis 1 (3):197-209.
Karen Kastenhofer (2010). Do We Need a Specific Kind of Technoscience Assessment? Taking the Convergence of Science and Technology Seriously. Poiesis and Praxis 7 (1-2):37-54.
G. J. van Der Wilt (2004). Health Technology Assessment: Trying to Bring Empirical and Ethical Inquiry Together. [REVIEW] Poiesis and Praxis 2 (2-3):195-206.
Wolfgang Liebert & Jan C. Schmidt (2010). Collingridge's Dilemma and Technoscience. Poiesis and Praxis 7 (1-2):55-71.
G. Wilt (2004). Health Technology Assessment: Trying to Bring Empirical and Ethical Inquiry Together. Poiesis and Praxis 2 (s 2-3):195-206.
D. S. Horner (2005). Anticipating Ethical Challenges: Is There a Coming Era of Nanotechnology? [REVIEW] Ethics and Information Technology 7 (3):127-138.
Sarah Spiekermann & Frank Pallas (2006). Technology Paternalism – Wider Implications of Ubiquitous Computing. Poiesis and Praxis 4 (1):6-18.
Philip Brey (2012). Anticipatory Ethics for Emerging Technologies. NanoEthics 6 (1):1-13.
Alfred Driessen (2009). Ethical Aspects of Research in Ultrafast Communication. In Paul Sollie & Marcus Düwell (eds.), Evaluating New Technologies: Methodological Problems for the Ethical Assessment of Technology Developments. Springer
Alfred Nordmann (2010). A Forensics of Wishing: Technology Assessment in the Age of Technoscience. [REVIEW] Poiesis and Praxis 7 (1-2):5-15.
Thomas Saretzki (2012). Legitimation Problems of Participatory Processes in Technology Assessment and Technology Policy. Poiesis and Praxis 9 (1-2):7-26.
Federica Lucivero, Tsjalling Swierstra & Marianne Boenink (2011). Assessing Expectations: Towards a Toolbox for an Ethics of Emerging Technologies. [REVIEW] NanoEthics 5 (2):129-141.
Asle H. Kiran & Peter-Paul Verbeek (2010). Trusting Our Selves to Technology. Knowledge, Technology and Policy 23 (3-4):409-427.
Tony Grajeda (2005). Disasterologies. Social Epistemology 19 (4):315 – 319.
Added to index2011-01-09
Total downloads9 ( #350,582 of 1,792,100 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #463,566 of 1,792,100 )
How can I increase my downloads?