|Abstract||As if that weren't enough of a puzzle, the more biologically frivolous and vain the activity, the more people exalt it. Art, literature, and music are thought to be not just pleasurable but noble. They are the mind's best work, what makes life worth living. Why do we pursue the biologically trivial and futile and experience them as sublime? To many educated people the question seems horribly philistine, even immoral. But it is unavoidable for anyone interested in the makeup of [Homo sapiens]. Members of our species do mad deeds like living for their art and (in India) selling their blood to buy movie tickets. Why? How might we understand the psychology of the arts within the modern understanding of the brain as a biological organ shaped by the forces of evolution?|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||No categories specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Eric R. Kandel (2011). The Age of Insight: The Quest to Understand the Unconscious in Art, Mind, and Brain: From Vienna 1900 to the Present. Random House.
Nigel Warburton (2003). The Art Question. Routledge.
Clementina Red (2012). Specular Phenomenology: Art and Art Criticism. Collingwood and British Idealism Studies 17 (2):248-260.
Marcello Frixione (2011). Art, the Brain, and Family Resemblances: Some Considerations on Neuroaesthetics. Philosophical Psychology 24 (5):699 - 715.
Cynthia Freeland (2001/2003). Art Theory: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press.
John Carey (2006). What Good Are the Arts? Oxford University Press.
Birgitta Dresp (2001). External Regularities and Adaptive Signal Exchanges in the Brain. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (4):663-664.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads44 ( #25,271 of 548,984 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,320 of 548,984 )
How can I increase my downloads?