Graduate studies at Western
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 42 (1):13-22 (2011)
|Abstract||Explanations of three different aspects of the rainbow are considered. The highly mathematical character of these explanations poses some interpretative questions concerning what the success of these explanations tells us about rainbows. I develop a proposal according to which mathematical explanations can highlight what is relevant about a given phenomenon while also indicating what is irrelevant to that phenomenon. This proposal is related to the extensive work by Batterman on asymptotic explanation with special reference to Batterman’s own discussion of the rainbow.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
M. Lange (2010). What Are Mathematical Coincidences (and Why Does It Matter)? Mind 119 (474):307-340.
David Sandborg (1998). Mathematical Explanation and the Theory of Why-Questions. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 49 (4):603-624.
David Pineda (2011). Non-Committal Causal Explanations. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 24 (2):147-170.
Carlos Zednik (2011). The Nature of Dynamical Explanation. Philosophy of Science 78 (2):238-263.
Davide Rizza (2011). Magicicada, Mathematical Explanation and Mathematical Realism. Erkenntnis 74 (1):101-114.
Christopher Pincock (2011). On Batterman's 'On the Explanatory Role of Mathematics in Empirical Science'. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 62 (1):211 - 217.
Juha Saatsi (2012). Mathematics and Program Explanations. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 90 (3):579-584.
Alan Baker (2005). Are There Genuine Mathematical Explanations of Physical Phenomena? Mind 114 (454):223-238.
Added to index2010-05-14
Total downloads18 ( #74,790 of 752,087 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,000 of 752,087 )
How can I increase my downloads?