David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Language comes so naturally to us that we are apt to forget what a strange and miraculous gift it is. Over the next hour you will sit in your chairs listening to a man make noise as he exhales. Why would you do such a thing? Not because the sounds are particularly melodious, but because the sounds convey information in the exact sequence of hisses and hums and squeaks and pops. As you recover the information, you think the thoughts that I want you to think. Right now I am conveying ideas about language itself, but with a slightly different sequence of hisses and pops I could be talking about anything from theories of the origin of the universe to the latest plot twists in your favorite daytime drama. The fundamental scientific problem raised by language is to explain this vast expressive power. What is the trick behind our ability to fill each other’s heads with so many kinds of thoughts?
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Adam Albright & Bruce Hayes (2003). Rules Vs. Analogy in English Past Tenses: A Computational/Experimental Study. Cognition 90 (2):119-161.
Similar books and articles
Christopher Gauker (2011). Words and Images: An Essay on the Origin of Ideas. Oxford University Press.
Paul Corazza (1999). Laver Sequences for Extendible and Super-Almost-Huge Cardinals. Journal of Symbolic Logic 64 (3):963-983.
Juliette Kennedy & Saharon Shelah (2002). On Regular Reduced Products. Journal of Symbolic Logic 67 (3):1169-1177.
Stéphane Demri & Hans De Nivelle (2005). Deciding Regular Grammar Logics with Converse Through First-Order Logic. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 14 (3):289-329.
Matthew Nudds (2010). What Are Auditory Objects? Review of Philosophy and Psychology 1 (1):105-122.
Howard Wettstein, Home About Us Contact Cognitive Significance Without Cognitive Content People Courses Colloquia Conference News/Events.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads12 ( #205,927 of 1,726,249 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #369,877 of 1,726,249 )
How can I increase my downloads?