Graduate studies at Western
Mind 117 (465):107 - 139 (2008)
|Abstract||Russell's version of the multiple-relation theory from the "Theory of Knowledge" manuscript is presented and defended against some objections. A new problem, related to defining truth via correspondence, is reconstructed from Russell's remarks and what we know of Wittgenstein's objection to Russell's theory. In the end, understanding this objection in terms of correspondence helps to link Russell's multiple-relation theory to his later views on propositions|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Alexander Miller (2006). Russell, Multiple Relations, and the Correspondence Theory of Truth. The Monist 89 (1):85-101.
Andrew Newman (2002). The Correspondence Theory of Truth: An Essay on the Metaphysics of Predication. Cambridge University Press.
Bernhard Weiss (1995). On the Demise of Russell's Multiple Relations Theory of Judgement. Theoria 61 (3):261-282.
Nicholas Griffin (1985). Russell's Multiple Relation Theory of Judgment. Philosophical Studies 47 (2):213 - 247.
Francisco Rodríguez Consuegra (1992). EI impacto de Wittgenstein sobre Russell. Theoria 7 (1-2):875-911.
Daniele Mezzadri (2010). Language and Logic in Wittgenstein's Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. Dissertation, University of Stirling
Gregory Landini (1991). A New Interpretation of Russell's Multiple-Relation Theory of Judgment. History and Philosophy of Logic 12 (1):37-69.
Peter W. Hanks (2007). How Wittgenstein Defeated Russell's Multiple Relation Theory of Judgment. Synthese 154 (1):121 - 146.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads17 ( #78,074 of 739,308 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,243 of 739,308 )
How can I increase my downloads?