Graduate studies at Western
Journal of Indian Philosophy 39 (4-5):461-477 (2011)
|Abstract||In a rare book published in Trivandrum (1927), entitled Sphoṭasiddhiḥ Bharatamiśrapranītā , we find an interesting argument in defense of sphoṭa -theory, based on āgamic quotations, especially RV X, 71, 4 (the stanza where the poet describes his own activity in perceiving the essence of Speech as like a beloved woman naked). The main idea is that the numerous word sphoṭas , as an atemporal multiplicity, free from any sensuous quality, were the objects of the Ṛṣis’ primordial intuition. So the internal diversity of the Veda is not a mere subjective convention in order to adapt the highest truth to limited human minds. The absolute brahman has an objective cosmogonical power of which the temporal mutiplicity is only the very last result. There is also an intermediate ideal multiplicity, which the Veda, as eternal and transcending the guru-śiṣya transmission, consists in|
|Keywords||Sphoṭa Dhvani Āgama Jāti Ṛṣi Bharata Miśra Veda Ontology Universal|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Maṇḍanamiśra (1966). Sphoṭasiddhi of Maṇḍana Miśra. Poona[Deccan College Post-Graduate and Research Institute].
Jacob Neusner & Noam M. M. Neusner (eds.) (1996). The Book of Jewish Wisdom: The Talmud of the Well-Considered Life. Continuum.
A. J. Ayer & Jane O'Grady (eds.) (1992/1994). A Dictionary of Philosophical Quotations. Blackwell Publishers.
Leigh W. Rutledge (1998). Would I Lie to You?: A Medley of Famous Fibs, Devious Deceptions, and Barefaced Lies. Plume.
Taeda Jovičić (2004). Authority-Based Argumentative Strategies: A Model for Their Evaluation. Argumentation 18 (1):1-24.
Kumārila Bhaṭṭa (2009). Ślokavārttikam of Kumārila Bhaṭṭa: With the Commentary Nyāyaratnākara of Śri Pārthasārathi Miśra: Translated Into English From the Original Sanskrit Text with Extracts From the Commentaries of Sucarita Miśra (the Kāśikā) & Pārthasārathi Miśra (the Nyāyaratnākara). Also Can Be Had From Chowkhamba Vidyabhawan.
Morton Wagman (ed.) (2000). Historical Dictionary of Quotations in Cognitive Science: A Treasury of Quotations in Psychology, Philosophy, and Artificial Intelligence. Greenwood Press.
David Hitchcock (2002). The Practice of Argumentative Discussion. Argumentation 16 (3):287-298.
A. Souter (1926). Classical Quotations in Medieval Glossaries Quotations From Classical Authors in Medieval Latin Glossaries. Collected and Annotated by James Frederick Mountford. Pp. 132. (Cornell Studies in Classical Philology, Vol. XXI.) New York and London: Longmans, Green and Co., 1925. $1.50. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 40 (02):85-86.
Assimakis Tseronis (2011). From Connectives to Argumentative Markers: A Quest for Markers of Argumentative Moves and of Related Aspects of Argumentative Discourse. [REVIEW] Argumentation 25 (4):427-447.
Carlo Penco (2010). The Influence of Einstein on Wittgenstein's Philosophy. Philosophical Investigations 33 (4):360-379.
Bart Geurts & Emar Maier (2005). Quotation in Context. In Philippe de Brabanter (ed.), Hybrid Quotations. John Benjamins.
Tzu-Hsiang Yu & Wei-Chun Wen (2004). Monologic and Dialogic Styles of Argumentation: A Bakhtinian Analysis of Academic Debates Between Mainland China and Taiwan. Argumentation 18 (3):369-379.
Renske Wierda & Jacky Visser Visser (2012). Direct-to-Consumer Advertisements for Prescription Drugs as an Argumentative Activity Type. Journal of Argumentation in Context 1 (1):81-96.
Added to index2011-07-20
Total downloads3 ( #213,434 of 723,130 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,087 of 723,130 )
How can I increase my downloads?