David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Inquiry 54 (5):541 - 563 (2011)
Abstract Freedom in the sense of free will is a multiway power to do any one of a number of things, leaving it up to us which one of a range of options by way of action we perform. What are the ethical implications of our possession of such a power? The paper examines the pre-Hobbesian scholastic view of writers such as Peter Lombard and Francisco Suárez: freedom as a multiway power is linked to the right to liberty understood as a right to exercise that power, and to liberation as a desirable goal involving the perfection of that power. Freedom as a power, liberty as a right, and liberation as a desirable goal, are all linked within this scholastic view to a distinctive theory of law as constituting, in its primary form of natural law, the normative recognition of human freedom. Hobbes's denial of the very existence of freedom as a power led him to a radical revision both of the theory of law and of the relation of law to liberty. Law and liberty were no longer harmonious phenomena, but were left in essential conflict. One legacy of Hobbes is the attempt to base a theory of law and liberty not on freedom as a multiway power, but on rationality. Instead of an ethics of freedom, we have an ethics of reason as involving autonomy. The paper expresses some scepticism about the prospects for such an appeal to reason as a replacement for multiway freedom
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
John Locke (1995). An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Oxford University Press.
John Henry McDowell (2009). Having the World in View: Essays on Kant, Hegel, and Sellars. Harvard University Press.
John Stuart Mill (1962). Utilitarianism. Cleveland, World Pub. Co..
Thomas Pink (2007). Normativity and Reason. Journal of Moral Philosophy 4 (3):406-431.
Citations of this work BETA
Thomas Pink (2015). Power, Scepticism and Ethical Theory. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 76:225-251.
Similar books and articles
Philip Pettit (2005). Liberty and Leviathan. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 4 (1):131-151.
William L. Rowe (1991). Thomas Reid on Freedom and Morality. Cornell University Press.
Thomas Pink (2009). Power and Moral Responsibility. Philosophical Explorations 12 (2):127 – 149.
Matthew J. Kisner (2011). Spinoza on Human Freedom: Reason, Autonomy and the Good Life. Cambridge University Press.
Thomas B. Talbott (1988). On the Divine Nature and the Nature of Divine Freedom. Faith and Philosophy 5 (1):3-24.
Mary T. Clark (ed.) (1973). The Problem of Freedom. New York,Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Leslie D. Feldman (1997). Freedom as Motion. Journal of Philosophical Research 22:229-243.
Wells Earl Draughon (2003). What Freedom Is. Writer's Showcase.
Xiangdong Xu (2011). Thomas Reid on Active Power and Free Agency. Frontiers of Philosophy in China 6 (3):369-389.
Jonathan Wolff (1997). Freedom, Liberty, and Property. Critical Review 11 (3):345-357.
Ian Burkitt (1993). Overcoming Metaphysics: Elias and Foucault on Power and Freedom. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 23 (1):50-72.
Lars Vinx (2010). Constitutional Indifferentism and Republican Freedom. Political Theory 38 (6):809-837.
Chris W. Surprenant (2010). Liberty, Autonomy, and Kant's Civil Society. History of Philosophy Quarterly 27 (1).
Eric S. Nelson (2012). Against Liberty: Adorno, Levinas, and the Pathologies of Freedom. Theoria 60 (131):64-83..
Added to index2011-09-09
Total downloads54 ( #81,330 of 1,911,604 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #321,691 of 1,911,604 )
How can I increase my downloads?