|Abstract||The irregulars are defiantly quirky. Thousands of verbs monotonously take the -ed suffix for their past tense forms, but ring mutates to rang, not ringed, catch becomes caught, hit doesn't do anything, and go is replaced by an entirely different word, went (a usurping of the old past tense of to wend, which itself once followed the pattern we see in send-sent and bend-bent). No wonder irregular verbs are banned in "rationally designed" languages like Esperanto and Orwell's Newspeak -- and why recently a woman in search of a nonconformist soul-mate wrote a personal ad that began, "Are you an irregular verb?".|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Joseph Shimron, Iris Berent & Stephen Pinker, Default Nominal Inﬂection in Hebrew: Evidence for Mental Variables.
Nicholas Denyer (1999). Names, Verbs and Quantification Again. Philosophy 74 (3):439-440.
Steven Pinker & Joseph Shimron, The Nature of Regularity and Irregularity: Evidence From Hebrew Nominal Inflection.
Barry Taylor (1977). Tense and Continuity. Linguistics and Philosophy 1 (2):199 - 220.
E. C. Marchant (1890). Hogue's Irregular Verbs of Attic Prose The Irregular Verbs of Attic Prose, Their Forms, Prominent Meanings, and Important Compounds; Together with Lists of Related Words and English Derivatives. By Addison Hogue, Professor of Greek in the University of Mississippi. Ginn and Co., 1889. 6s. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 4 (04):166-168.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads20 ( #61,442 of 548,984 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,320 of 548,984 )
How can I increase my downloads?