Graduate studies at Western
Critical Inquiry 31 (3) (2005)
|Abstract||My topic is authenticity in or perhaps as painting, not the authenticity of paintings; I know next to nothing about the problem of verifying claims of authorship. I am interested in another kind of genuineness and fraudulence, the kind at issue when we say of a person that he or she is false, not genuine, inauthentic, lacks integrity, and, especially when we say he or she is playing to the crowd, playing for eﬀect, or is a poseur. These are not quite moral distinctions (no one has a duty to be authentic), but they are robustly normative appraisals, applicable even when such falseness is not a case of straight hypocrisy but of lack of self-knowledge or of self-deceit. (A person can be quite sincere and not realize the extent of her submission to the other’s expectations and demands.) This sort of appraisal also has a long history in post-Rousseauist reﬂections on the dangers of uniquely modern forms of social dependence, and they are prominent worries in the modern novel.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Michael Heim (1983). Authenticity is Not a Real Predicate. Research in Phenomenology 13 (1):199-207.
Simon D. Feldman & Allan Hazlett (2013). What's Bad About Bad Faith? European Journal of Philosophy 21 (1):50-73.
Neil Levy (2011). Enhancing Authenticity. Journal of Applied Philosophy 28 (3):308-318.
Elizabeth Burns Coleman (2001). Aboriginal Painting: Identity and Authenticity. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 59 (4):385–402.
Nigel Wentworth (2004). The Phenomenology of Painting. Cambridge University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads28 ( #49,929 of 738,504 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #26,464 of 738,504 )
How can I increase my downloads?