On Pippin's postscript
Graduate studies at Western
|Abstract||In my ‘Reponses’ to critics (McDowell 2002), I devoted three pages to Pippin’s ‘Leaving Nature Behind, or Two Cheers for ‘‘Subjectivism’’ ’ (Pippin 2002). Pippin reprinted that paper in his The Persistence of Subjectivity (Pippin 2005),1 with a fifteen-page postscript, in which he connects a response to my response with some of the broader themes of the book. This is a response to Pippin’s response to my response, and I suppose I should worry about diminishing returns. But there is room for clarification of some issues.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
|External links||This entry has no external links. Add one.|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Robert B. Pippin (2005). The Persistence of Subjectivity: On the Kantian Aftermath. Cambridge University Press.
Robert B. Pippin (ed.) (2012). Introductions to Nietzsche. Cambridge University Press.
Robert B. Pippin (1997). Idealism as Modernism: Hegelian Variations. Cambridge University Press.
David S. Stern (1995). Unending Modernity. Inquiry 38 (3):277 – 288.
Robert B. Pippin (2007). McDowell's Germans: Response to 'on Pippin's Postscript'. European Journal of Philosophy 15 (3):411–434.
Robert Pippin (2011). Response to Critics. Inquiry 53 (5):506-521.
Robert B. Pippin (2010). Nietzsche, Psychology, and First Philosophy. The University of Chicago Press.
Nomy Arpaly (2007). Reply to Pippin. Philosophical Explorations 10 (3):303 – 307.
John McDowell (2007). On Pippin's Postscript. European Journal of Philosophy 15 (3):395–410.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads3 ( #213,434 of 723,130 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?