George Boole's 'conditions of possible experience' and the quantum puzzle
British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 45 (1):95-125 (1994)
| Abstract | In the mid-nineteenth century George Boole formulated his ‘conditions of possible experience’. These are equations and ineqaulities that the relative frequencies of (logically connected) events must satisfy. Some of Boole's conditions have been rediscovered in more recent years by physicists, including Bell inequalities, Clauser Horne inequalities, and many others. In this paper, the nature of Boole's conditions and their relation to propositional logic is explained, and the puzzle associated with their violation by quantum frequencies is investigated in relation to a variety of approaches to the interpretation of quantum mechanics. * While preparing this paper for publication I have learnt of the untimely death of Professor J. S. Bell, and I wish to dedicate the paper to his memory. This research was undertaken while I spent a sabbatical leave at Wolfson College, and the History and Philosophy of Science Department at the University of Cambridge. I would like to thank Michael Redhead and Jeremy Butterfield for their hospitality and for helpful discussions. A first draft of this paper has been distributed among the participants of the conference 'Einstein in Context' which was held in Israel, in April 1990.1 have benefited from the comments of many colleagues. I would like to thank in particular Arthur Fine who enlightened me on the prism models, David Albert. Maya Bar-Hillel. Yemima Ben-Menachem, Mara Beller. Simon Saunders, and Mark Steiner. This research is partially supported by the Edelstein Center for the History and Philosophy of Science at the Hebrew University. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,631 |
| External links |
  Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesLászló E. Szabó, The Einstein--Podolsky--Rosen Argument and the Bell Inequalities. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
George Svetlichny, Michael Redhead, Harvey Brown & Jeremy Butterfield (1988). Do the Bell Inequalities Require the Existence of Joint Probability Distributions? Philosophy of Science 55 (3):387-401.
George Boole (1952/2004). Studies in Logic and Probability. Dover Publications.
Robert Batterman (1992). Quantum Chaos and Semiclassical Mechanics. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1992:50 - 65.
George Boole (1982). The Boole-De Morgan Correspondence, 1842-1864. Oxford University Press.
George Boole (1859/1991). Derivation of the Laws of the Symbols of Logic From the Laws of the Operations of the Human Mind: An Excerpt From the Writings of George Boole. St. Sebastian Press.
I. Grattan-Guinness (1991). The Correspondence Between George Boole and Stanley Jevons, 1863–1864. History and Philosophy of Logic 12 (1):15-35.
Nicla Vassallo (2000). Psychologism in Logic: Some Similarities Between Boole and Frege. In J. Gasser (ed.), A Boole Anthology. Recent and Classical Studies in the Logic of George Boole. Kluwer.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads27 ( #45,693 of 548,973 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,511 of 548,973 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
