Graduate studies at Western
Philosophia 25 (1-4):247-266 (1997)
|Abstract||The dispositional account of colour has recently come under fire from a number of different directions (reflecting the various alternative options mentioned at the beginning). I believe that in the above I have dealt with the principal objections raised against this account by those who reject it. I cannot pretend to have established that the account is true; but if I am right about the failure of the objections I have discussed, and the difficulites of alternative accounts of colour, then dispositionalism appears to remain the most promising account of colour available|
|Keywords||Color Epistemology Perception Sense Vision Locke|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Bernard Harrison (1967). On Describing Colors. Inquiry 10 (1-4):38-52.
Evan Thompson (1995). Colour Vision. Routledge.
Clement W. K. Mundle (1971). Perception: Facts And Theories. London,: Oxford University Press,.
Mohan P. Matthen (1999). The Disunity of Color. Philosophical Review 108 (1):47-84.
Edward W. Averill (2005). Toward a Projectivist Account of Color. Journal of Philosophy 102 (5):217-34.
Virgil Whitmyer (1999). Ecological Color. Philosophical Psychology 12 (2):197-214.
J. Harvey (2000). Colour-Dispositionalism and its Recent Critics. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 61 (1):137-156.
Peter W. Ross (2012). Perceived Colors and Perceived Locations: A Problem for Color Subjectivism. American Philosophical Quarterly 49 (2):125-138.
Vivian Mizrahi (2009). Is Colour Composition Phenomenal? In D. Skusevich & P. Matikas (eds.), Color Perception: Physiology, Processes and Analysis. Nova Science Publishers.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads17 ( #78,143 of 739,482 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,680 of 739,482 )
How can I increase my downloads?