David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 69 (1):1-36 (2004)
A number of philosophers endorse, without argument, the view that there's something it's like consciously to think that p, which is distinct from what it's like consciously to think that q. This thesis, if true, would have important consequences for philosophy of mind and cognitive science. In this paper I offer two arguments for it. The first argument claims it would be impossible introspectively to distinguish conscious thoughts with respect to their content if there weren't something it's like to think them. This argument is defended against several objections. The second argument uses what I call "minimal pair" experiences--sentences read without and with understanding--to induce in the reader an experience of the kind I claim exists. Further objections are considered and rebutted
|Keywords||Cognition Externalism Intentionality Metaphysics Phenomenology|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Saul A. Kripke (1980). Naming and Necessity. Harvard University Press.
John Locke (1995). An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Oxford University Press.
Gareth Evans (1982). Varieties of Reference. Oxford University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
David Bourget (2015). The Role of Consciousness in Grasping and Understanding. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 91 (1):n/a-n/a.
Daniel A. Wilkenfeld (2013). Understanding as Representation Manipulability. Synthese 190 (6):997-1016.
David Bourget & Angela Mendelovici (2014). Tracking Representationalism. In Andrew Bailey (ed.), Philosophy of Mind: The Key Thinkers. Continuum 209-235.
Angela Mendelovici & David Bourget (2014). Naturalizing Intentionality: Tracking Theories Versus Phenomenal Intentionality Theories. Philosophy Compass 9 (5):325-337.
Tom McClelland (2016). Gappiness and the Case for Liberalism About Phenomenal Properties. Philosophical Quarterly (264):536-558.
Similar books and articles
Richard Menary (2006). Radical Enactivism: Intentionality, Phenomenology and Narrative: Focus on the Philosophy of Daniel D. Hutto. Amsterdam: J Benjamins.
Richard Menary (2009). Intentionality and Consciousness. In William Banks (ed.), Encyclopaedia of Consciousness. Elsevier
Shoji Nagataki & Satoru Hirose (2007). Phenomenology and the Third Generation of Cognitive Science: Towards a Cognitive Phenomenology of the Body. [REVIEW] Human Studies 30 (3):219 - 232.
Rolf-Peter Horstmann (2006). Hegel's Phenomenology of Spirit as an Argument for a Monistic Ontology. Inquiry 49 (1):103 – 118.
Alessandra Tanesini (2008). Intentionality and the Externalism Versus Internalism Debate. Abstracta 2 (3):45-53.
Johan Veldeman (2001). Externalism and Phenomenal Content. Communication and Cognition: An Interdisciplinary Quarterly Journal 34 (1-2):155-177.
York H. Gunther (2004). The Phenomenology and Intentionality of Emotion. Philosophical Studies 117 (1-2):43-55.
Uriah Kriegel (2011). Cognitive Phenomenology as the Basis of Unconscious Content. In T. Bayne & M. Montague (eds.), Cognitive Phenomenology. Oxford University Press 79--102.
David Pitt (2004). The Phenomenology of Cognition, Or, What Is It Like to Think That P? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research (1):1-36.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads312 ( #7,030 of 1,911,411 )
Recent downloads (6 months)27 ( #25,561 of 1,911,411 )
How can I increase my downloads?