David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy and Social Criticism 38 (9):977-995 (2012)
Many Levinasians are prone to merely assert or presuppose that the Other is ‘radically Other’, and that such Otherness is of patent ethical significance. But building ethics into the very concept of ‘the Other’ seems question-begging. What then, if not mere Otherness, might motivate Levinasian responsibility? In the following discussion I argue that this can best be answered by reading Levinas as a post-Holocaust thinker, preoccupied with how one’s simply being-here constitutes a ‘usurpation of spaces belonging to the other’. Then, drawing on Schutz’s phenomenology, I explain how the resultant usurpatory bad conscience presupposes the embodied ‘interchangeability’ of self and Other. As such, one can be said to ‘usurp’ the Other’s place only insofar as self and Other are not radically different
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Juan Ignacio Staricco (forthcoming). Fair Trade and the Fetishization of Levinasian Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics.
Similar books and articles
Cheryl L. Hughes (1998). The Primacy of Ethics: Hobbes and Levinas. [REVIEW] Continental Philosophy Review 31 (1):79-94.
Simon Critchley (2004). Five Problems in Levinas's View of Politics and the Sketch of a Solution to Them. Political Theory 32 (2):172-185.
Barbara Jane Davy (2007). An Other Face of Ethics in Levinas. Ethics and the Environment 12 (1):39-66.
Hanoch Ben Pazi (2003). Rebuilding the Feminine in Levinas's Talmudic Readings. Journal of Jewish Thought and Philosophy 12 (3):1-32.
Kris Sealey (2010). The Primacy of Disruption in Levinas Account of Transcendence. Research in Phenomenology 40 (3):363-377.
David Bevan & Hervé Corvellec (2007). The Impossibility of Corporate Ethics: For a Levinasian Approach to Managerial Ethics. Business Ethics 16 (3):208–219.
John Caruana (2007). The Drama of Being: Levinas and the History of Philosophy. Continental Philosophy Review 40 (3):251-273.
B. Plant (2011). Welcoming Dogs: Levinas and 'the Animal' Question. Philosophy and Social Criticism 37 (1):49-71.
Silvia Benso (2008). Aesth-Ethics. Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 13 (1):163-183.
William Edelglass (2006). Levinas on Suffering and Compassion. Sophia 45 (2):43-59.
Peter Atterton (2011). Levinas and Our Moral Responsibility Toward Other Animals. Inquiry 54 (6):633 - 649.
Rockwell F. Clancy (2012). Human Nature and Holocaust: Understanding Levinas’s Account of Ethics Through Levi and Wiesel. Philosophy and Literature 36 (2):330-346.
Adriaan Theodoor Peperzak (ed.) (1995). Ethics as First Philosophy: The Significance of Emmanuel Levinas for Philosophy, Literature, and Religion. Routledge.
Bob Plant (2000). Resisting Silence In the Face of Evil. Philosophy in the Contemporary World 7 (1):27-34.
Added to index2012-10-17
Total downloads60 ( #73,075 of 1,911,312 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #252,427 of 1,911,312 )
How can I increase my downloads?